3 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] BLACKLIST
FromSent OnAttachments
Alessandro VeselyJul 23, 2001 10:08 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 23, 2001 2:39 pm 
Ken HerronJul 23, 2001 4:14 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] BLACKLISTActions...
From:Ken Herron (kher@newsguy.com)
Date:Jul 23, 2001 4:14:51 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

--On Monday, July 23, 2001 19:08:35 +0200 Alessandro Vesely <ves@tana.it> wrote:

Some use 571 as an error code. Anybody knows what does it mean?

5.7.1 is the RFC 1893 "enhanced mail system status code" for policy refusal. Some people have misinterpreted RFC 1893 and come to the mistaken conclusion that the codes in that RFC can be used as SMTP codes. This is a mistake. RFC actually defines codes to be used within a delivery status notice or the text part of an SMTP reply, not as an SMTP reply itself.

The legal SMTP codes are specified in RFC 2821 (superceding 821). 571 one of them.

A few years ago, when spamming was new and I was running a commercial mail setup, I used 471 and 571 as SMTP reply codes for a while and encountered SMTP clients that wouldn't recognize anything but the standard reply codes to mean permanent rejection. One could argue that these clients should accept any 5yz code, but really, you should stick to the standard SMTP codes rather than making up your own. You can do something like

553 5.7.1 buzz off!

if you want, though don't know if any SMTP client will do anything useful with the 5.7.1.