atom feed13 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] [GEM] pix_blur ???? whic...
FromSent OnAttachments
IOhannes zmoelnigFeb 19, 2003 12:07 pm 
chris clepperFeb 19, 2003 6:21 pm 
bbogartFeb 20, 2003 8:37 am 
zmoe...@iem.atFeb 21, 2003 12:38 am 
guenter geigerFeb 21, 2003 3:33 am 
MeFeb 21, 2003 7:36 am 
Matthew AllenFeb 21, 2003 10:10 am 
chris clepperFeb 21, 2003 10:47 am 
chris clepperFeb 21, 2003 11:58 am 
IOhannes zmoelnigFeb 24, 2003 2:48 am 
guenter geigerFeb 24, 2003 5:33 am 
chris clepperFeb 24, 2003 11:00 am 
IOhannes zmoelnigFeb 24, 2003 11:29 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] [GEM] pix_blur ???? which Gem-objects do we need (have) ?
From:guenter geiger (gei@xdv.org)
Date:Feb 24, 2003 5:33:21 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, IOhannes zmoelnig wrote:

3. abstractions vs built-ins ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ note: this is not intended to be authoritative but a suggestion: abstractions: use abstractions when it is possible without to much speed-loss, whatever is "too much"... built-ins: keep them as flexible as possible (without too much speed-loss). make them as optimized as possible.

Lets make a directory for abstractions. The abstractions solution only works if the abstractions are there.

Then there is a lot of work to doregarding the documentation. Why might ask over at the pd list if there are people interested in working on this.

I think these are very important usability issues too.

Guenter