| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Keir Fraser | Jun 4, 2009 8:45 am | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 4, 2009 9:09 am | |
| Tim Post | Jun 4, 2009 9:15 am | |
| Boris Derzhavets | Jun 4, 2009 11:01 am | |
| Espen Skoglund | Jun 4, 2009 11:07 am | |
| Keir Fraser | Jun 4, 2009 11:17 am | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 4, 2009 11:20 am | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 4, 2009 11:46 am | |
| Keir Fraser | Jun 4, 2009 12:08 pm | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 4, 2009 12:12 pm | |
| Andrew Lyon | Jun 5, 2009 12:31 am | |
| Boris Derzhavets | Jun 5, 2009 12:36 am | |
| Pasi Kärkkäinen | Jun 5, 2009 12:46 am | |
| Keir Fraser | Jun 5, 2009 12:51 am | |
| Boris Derzhavets | Jun 5, 2009 12:53 am | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 5, 2009 12:57 am | |
| Pasi Kärkkäinen | Jun 5, 2009 1:29 am | |
| Boris Derzhavets | Jun 5, 2009 3:44 am | |
| Christian Tramnitz | Jun 5, 2009 6:26 am | |
| Keir Fraser | Jun 5, 2009 6:36 am | |
| Dulloor | Jun 5, 2009 7:04 am | |
| Christian Tramnitz | Jun 5, 2009 7:05 am | |
| Ian Pratt | Jun 5, 2009 7:36 am | |
| Gerd Hoffmann | Jun 5, 2009 9:40 am | |
| Gerd Hoffmann | Jun 5, 2009 10:12 am | |
| Carsten Schiers | Jun 5, 2009 10:58 am | |
| Keir Fraser | Jun 5, 2009 11:48 am | |
| Andy Burns | Jun 5, 2009 11:51 am | |
| Carsten Schiers | Jun 5, 2009 2:02 pm | |
| Genki Kuroda | Jun 5, 2009 4:05 pm | |
| Kamala Narasimhan | Jun 5, 2009 7:16 pm | |
| Genki Kuroda | Jun 5, 2009 7:47 pm | |
| Kamala Narasimhan | Jun 5, 2009 7:53 pm | |
| Genki Kuroda | Jun 5, 2009 10:25 pm | |
| Jean Guyader | Jun 6, 2009 2:54 am | |
| Boris Derzhavets | Jun 6, 2009 1:11 pm | |
| Pasi Kärkkäinen | Jun 7, 2009 10:09 am | |
| Andy Burns | Jun 7, 2009 11:51 am |
| Subject: | AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Carsten Schiers (cars...@schiers.de) | |
| Date: | Jun 5, 2009 10:58:13 am | |
| List: | com.xensource.lists.xen-devel | |
Go ahead! It is really time to stop forward-porting stuff. The time is much better spent in adding the missing features to pv_ops/dom0. Also
just after the 3.4 release is the perfect moment for that move, 3.5 should be able to ship with a pv_ops based kernel then.
I'd vote for that, too. Whatever comes out of that discussion on "coolness" on lkml ;o), I guess pv_ops is what will be the outcome. Inside or outside the linux kernel tree.
What I'd like to add is that I would prefer a better tagging of the kernel repo to identify subversion of the kernel that belong to a certain version of Xen, whatever kernel that might be. Fixes and improvements are happening so quickly that on the pure user's side the combination can make a difference, no matter how much effort you put in to keep it independent.
BR, Carsten.
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-...@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel





