atom feed24 messages in net.java.dev.glassfish.adminRe: Comments on grizzly config one pager
FromSent OnAttachments
Justin LeeJan 23, 2009 8:16 am 
Justin LeeJan 23, 2009 8:17 am 
Oleksiy StashokJan 23, 2009 8:45 am 
Lloyd ChambersJan 27, 2009 12:56 pm 
Justin LeeJan 28, 2009 7:41 am 
Lloyd ChambersJan 29, 2009 10:58 am 
Justin LeeJan 29, 2009 1:01 pm 
Justin LeeJan 30, 2009 12:09 pm 
Lloyd ChambersJan 30, 2009 3:32 pm 
Lloyd ChambersJan 30, 2009 3:40 pm 
Kedar MhaswadeJan 30, 2009 3:46 pm 
June...@Sun.COMJan 30, 2009 3:51 pm 
Kedar MhaswadeJan 30, 2009 3:54 pm 
Lloyd ChambersJan 30, 2009 3:55 pm 
Kedar MhaswadeJan 30, 2009 4:40 pm 
Justin LeeJan 30, 2009 5:04 pm 
Jerome DochezFeb 2, 2009 9:20 am 
Kedar MhaswadeFeb 2, 2009 10:53 am 
Jerome DochezFeb 2, 2009 11:22 am 
Kedar MhaswadeFeb 2, 2009 2:15 pm 
Tim QuinnFeb 2, 2009 3:05 pm 
Kedar MhaswadeFeb 2, 2009 3:17 pm 
Jerome DochezFeb 3, 2009 12:50 pm 
Kedar MhaswadeFeb 3, 2009 1:19 pm 
Subject:Re: Comments on grizzly config one pager
From:Tim Quinn (Timo@Sun.COM)
Date:Feb 2, 2009 3:05:14 pm
List:net.java.dev.glassfish.admin

Kedar Mhaswade wrote:

Jerome Dochez wrote:

I would like to see the DTD for overall domain.xml validation more than field validation which as you mention will be preferably handled by the beans validation framework.

For a schema validation kind of requirement, yes, I agree, DTD will come in handy.

Is there a reason to prefer a DTD to an XSD, if someone actually starts on this work?

- Tim