19 messages in org.apache.lucene.generalRe: [VOTE] Merge the development of S...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael McCandless | Mar 4, 2010 1:32 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 4, 2010 1:34 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 4, 2010 1:35 pm | |
| Simon Willnauer | Mar 4, 2010 1:40 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 4, 2010 1:42 pm | |
| Uwe Schindler | Mar 4, 2010 1:45 pm | |
| Shalin Shekhar Mangar | Mar 4, 2010 2:18 pm | |
| Andi Vajda | Mar 4, 2010 2:28 pm | |
| Robert Muir | Mar 4, 2010 2:42 pm | |
| Bill Au | Mar 4, 2010 3:06 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 4, 2010 3:11 pm | |
| Michael Busch | Mar 4, 2010 3:13 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 4, 2010 3:26 pm | |
| Koji Sekiguchi | Mar 4, 2010 3:37 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 5, 2010 6:50 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 5, 2010 11:14 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Mar 8, 2010 4:13 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 9, 2010 2:38 pm | |
| Erik Hatcher | Mar 10, 2010 4:52 am |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Ryan McKinley (ryan...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 8, 2010 4:13:35 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.general | |
Wow... i've been offline for a while (new baby, yaaaay!) and am now skimming through the various lists...
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
* Merging the dev lists into a single list.
* Merging committers.
* When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or to Lucene), all tests must pass.
* Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may release without Solr.
* Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, queries).
+1
this would be a big advantage to solr, and I don't see any real downside to lucene-only folks.
These things would not change:
* Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
* Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX issues).
* User's lists remain separate.
* Web sites remain separate.
* Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
Mike