16 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-develRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] PV-on-HVM driver...
FromSent OnAttachments
DOI Tsunehisa24 Aug 2006 06:13.patch, .patch, .patch, 2 more
Tristan Gingold24 Aug 2006 06:46 
Doi....@jp.fujitsu.com24 Aug 2006 16:47 
DOI Tsunehisa24 Aug 2006 19:13.patch2
Tristan Gingold25 Aug 2006 00:09 
Doi....@jp.fujitsu.com25 Aug 2006 00:31 
DOI Tsunehisa25 Aug 2006 01:29.patch3
DOI Tsunehisa25 Aug 2006 01:44.patch4
Alex Williamson25 Aug 2006 16:13 
土肥 実久25 Aug 2006 22:45.patch, .patch, .patch
Alex Williamson27 Aug 2006 07:34 
Doi....@jp.fujitsu.com27 Aug 2006 16:34 
DOI Tsunehisa27 Aug 2006 17:10.patch2
Alex Williamson27 Aug 2006 18:52 
DOI Tsunehisa28 Aug 2006 04:09.patch2
Alex Williamson28 Aug 2006 16:24 
Subject:Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] PV-on-HVM driver for IPF
From:DOI Tsunehisa (Doi.@jp.fujitsu.com)
Date:08/28/2006 04:09:09 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-devel
Attachments:
linux-ia64.patch2 - 4k

Alex Williamson wrote:

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 08:35 +0900, Doi.@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:

In PV-on-HVM driver code, is_running_on_xen and HYPERVISOR_ioremap have to be used as valid feature. Thus we modified like this.

Doesn't the below do what you need w/o breaking the CONFIG_XEN=n build? It's important to keep both builds working. Thanks,

Thank you for suggestion.

We modified linux-ia64.patch. I'll post it.

And, We'll change PV-on-HVM implementation in xen side which uses same method of x86 code.

Thanks, - Tsunehisa Doi