| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rob Tice | Sep 28, 2008 11:56 pm | |
| De Smedt Johan | Sep 29, 2008 12:15 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 1:30 am | |
| Aida Slavic | Sep 29, 2008 2:13 am | |
| De Smedt Johan | Sep 29, 2008 2:26 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 2:32 am | |
| Rob Tice | Sep 29, 2008 3:30 am | |
| De Smedt Johan | Sep 29, 2008 4:05 am | |
| Aida Slavic | Sep 29, 2008 4:06 am | |
| Rob Tice | Sep 29, 2008 4:53 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 5:05 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 10:48 am | |
| Houghton,Andrew | Sep 29, 2008 11:07 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 9:13 pm | |
| Alan Ruttenberg | Sep 29, 2008 9:29 pm | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Sep 29, 2008 11:00 pm | |
| Alan Ruttenberg | Sep 29, 2008 11:26 pm | |
| Antoine Isaac | Sep 30, 2008 2:55 am | |
| Stephen Bounds | Sep 30, 2008 3:49 am | |
| Leonard Will | Sep 30, 2008 4:43 am | |
| Panzer,Michael | Oct 1, 2008 8:19 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Oct 1, 2008 1:02 pm | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Oct 1, 2008 1:04 pm | |
| Alan Ruttenberg | Oct 2, 2008 3:16 am | |
| Antoine Isaac | Oct 2, 2008 7:23 am | |
| Alistair Miles | Oct 2, 2008 9:29 am | |
| Sini, Margherita (KCEW) | Oct 2, 2008 11:27 am |
| Subject: | revisions and change in skos | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Rob Tice (rob....@k-int.com) | |
| Date: | Sep 28, 2008 11:56:49 pm | |
| List: | org.w3.public-esw-thes | |
Dear list members
The background to my questions is that we are currently considering developing a 'SKOS resolver' (for want of a better description) for our terminology management solution to sit alongside the other formats we currently implement.
This has however thrown up some questions.
As part of this requirement we (ideally)need to: 1 Expose versioning information 2 Allow identification of terminology changes between versions
As these are parts of our existing solution which are already exposed using other formats.
So...
1. How should we expose versioning information given that uri's for concepts are fixed (please don’t say timestamps on uri's :))
2. How should we identify and manage change between revisions of concept schemes as this 'seems' to result in imprecision. e.g. a concept 'a' is currently in thes 'A' and only has a preferred label. A new revision of thes 'A' is published and what was concept 'a' is now a non preferred concept and thus becomes simply a non preferred label for a new concept 'b'.
It seems to me that this operation loses some of the semantic meaning of the change as all references to the concept id of 'concept a' would be lost as it now is only a non preferred
label of a different concept with a different id (concept 'b').
Any comments would be much appreciated.
Best Regards
Rob
------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Tice, Director Knowledge Integration Ltd 35 Paradise Street Sheffield South Yorkshire S3 8PZ email: rob....@k-int.com Tel: +44 (0)870 803 4661 http://www.k-int.com
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release Date: 27/09/2008 13:11





