| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dixie Pine | Oct 6, 2009 4:58 pm | .pdf, .pdf, .pdf |
| Kedar Mhaswade | Oct 14, 2009 5:14 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 14, 2009 8:30 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 16, 2009 5:37 pm | .pdf, .pdf, .pdf |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 19, 2009 6:16 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 20, 2009 10:27 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 20, 2009 10:42 am | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 20, 2009 2:06 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 20, 2009 2:18 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 20, 2009 2:26 pm | |
| kedar | Oct 20, 2009 2:52 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 21, 2009 3:52 pm | .pdf |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 21, 2009 3:54 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 21, 2009 6:38 pm | |
| Paul Davies | Oct 21, 2009 6:58 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 21, 2009 7:33 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 21, 2009 9:13 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:00 pm | .pdf |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:01 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:38 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 22, 2009 12:48 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 12:53 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 2:31 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 2:50 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 2:51 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 3:57 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 8:53 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 9:00 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 9:48 pm | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 10:07 am | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 10:11 am | |
| Paul Davies | Oct 23, 2009 1:14 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 23, 2009 1:18 pm | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 3:13 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 28, 2009 5:53 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 29, 2009 10:07 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 8:37 am | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 30, 2009 8:46 am | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 9:39 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 11:28 am | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 30, 2009 11:42 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 1:07 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 1:32 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 2:01 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 2:21 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 2:35 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 30, 2009 2:54 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 3:01 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 4:15 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 2, 2009 5:01 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 2, 2009 5:03 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Nov 2, 2009 5:30 pm | |
| June...@Sun.COM | Nov 3, 2009 10:15 am | |
| Paul Davies | Nov 3, 2009 12:33 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 3, 2009 12:51 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Final Review of create-domain man page | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bill Shannon (bill...@sun.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 21, 2009 7:33:33 pm | |
| List: | net.java.dev.glassfish.admin | |
Dixie Pine wrote on 10/21/09 3:55 PM:
On 10/20/09 02:18 PM, Sankar Neelakandan wrote:
Hi Dixie, --adminport and --portbase are mutually exclusive options. It should be described as [--adminport 4848 | --portbase portbase] [--instanceport 8080]
I looked at the command message and I see no attempt to indicate mutual exclusivity. It gets very complicated, especially when instanceport is factored in. So I added a sentence in each port option description to explain the mutual exclusivity.
The command metadata isn't rich enough to express this relationship between options, so the code that automatically generates the usage message based on the command metadata can't do any better. We could hardwire the usage message, but that makes it more fragile as the command is changed.
*BUG?* 4848 and 8080 should not be in the command message, but they are. They should be shown as <adminport> and <instanceport> replaceables. I changed the man page. Can the command message be fixed?
It's a feature. :-)
Seriously, people asked for the usage message to indicate the default values of the options, where they're known, so that's what the code does. If there's consensus that that should be removed, that's easy to do.
Let's see what people think. I created a poll...






.pdf, .pdf, .pdf