17 messages in com.googlegroups.adwords-apiRe: Visual Studio 2005| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| jose...@gmail.com | 07 Mar 2007 18:23 | |
| Erik Bonder | 07 Mar 2007 23:38 | |
| clafollett | 08 Mar 2007 06:29 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 08 Mar 2007 06:58 | |
| clafollett | 08 Mar 2007 07:16 | |
| CFJ | 08 Mar 2007 07:28 | |
| fredIsDead | 08 Mar 2007 07:47 | |
| fredIsDead | 08 Mar 2007 07:48 | |
| clafollett | 08 Mar 2007 08:03 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 08 Mar 2007 11:24 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 08 Mar 2007 20:49 | |
| clafollett | 09 Mar 2007 05:58 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 09 Mar 2007 06:32 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 09 Mar 2007 18:32 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 10 Mar 2007 09:48 | |
| Rori Stumpf | 10 Mar 2007 17:43 | |
| jose...@gmail.com | 10 Mar 2007 20:10 |
| Subject: | Re: Visual Studio 2005![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | clafollett (c....@sendtec.com) |
| Date: | 03/09/2007 05:58:43 AM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.adwords-api |
Joseph,
Google has actually created some helpful .NET utility classes for us if you care to use them. You can find them here:
http://google-api-adwords-dotnet.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/
The AdWordsUser is a class that they created outside of the Webservices. It just wraps things up in a nice way in order to help us keep down repetative code and so you don't have to create this functionality yourself.
Hope this helps?
On Mar 8, 11:49 pm, "jose...@gmail.com" <jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
One thing that has me quite confused is the AdwordsUser object that is used in the .NET source code examples. I have searched it and from what I have gathered, it is not an object from one of the Web services. Is this correct? Do I need to create an AdwordsUser class? Is there some documentation that I could read to bring myself up to speed on this?
I do have my web services correctly in place thanks.
Thanks,
J
On Mar 8, 12:25 pm, "jose...@gmail.com"
<jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
Great stuff guys, I appreciate the help.
I can't wait to get home and look into some of this stuff.
I'll keep you posted on my success/failure.
Thanks again,
J
On Mar 8, 9:03 am, "clafollett" <c....@sendtec.com> wrote:
Good stuff right there!!!
On Mar 8, 10:47 am, "fredIsDead" <addo...@gmail.com> wrote:
I second the approach of using the WSDL command to generate the code.
It offers a lot more clarity in the process than letting VS hide
everything. However, I built the xml parameters file so it's a little
easier to keep track of and share with others what's going on.- Hide quoted text
-
- Show quoted text -




