38 messages in org.apache.incubator.cloudstack-devRe: Drop OVM in 4.0?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Edison Su | Oct 17, 2012 11:25 am | |
| Kelcey Damage (BBITS) | Oct 17, 2012 11:27 am | |
| Frank Zhang | Oct 17, 2012 11:35 am | |
| Kelcey Damage (BBITS) | Oct 17, 2012 11:37 am | |
| Edison Su | Oct 17, 2012 11:37 am | |
| Kelcey Damage (BBITS) | Oct 17, 2012 11:39 am | |
| David Nalley | Oct 17, 2012 11:40 am | |
| Frank Zhang | Oct 17, 2012 11:47 am | |
| David Nalley | Oct 17, 2012 11:51 am | |
| Sudha Ponnaganti | Oct 17, 2012 11:53 am | |
| Sudha Ponnaganti | Oct 17, 2012 12:20 pm | |
| Will Chan | Oct 17, 2012 1:55 pm | |
| Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central | Oct 17, 2012 2:40 pm | |
| Outback Dingo | Oct 17, 2012 2:42 pm | |
| Caleb Call | Oct 17, 2012 3:01 pm | |
| Kelcey Damage (BBITS) | Oct 17, 2012 3:06 pm | |
| Chiradeep Vittal | Oct 17, 2012 4:50 pm | |
| David Nalley | Oct 17, 2012 4:54 pm | |
| Edison Su | Oct 17, 2012 4:55 pm | |
| Chiradeep Vittal | Oct 17, 2012 4:58 pm | |
| Frank Zhang | Oct 17, 2012 6:59 pm | |
| Joe Brockmeier | Oct 17, 2012 7:30 pm | |
| Chip Childers | Oct 18, 2012 7:11 am | |
| Will Chan | Oct 18, 2012 10:01 am | |
| John Kinsella | Oct 18, 2012 10:04 am | |
| Jessica Tomechak | Oct 18, 2012 10:05 am | |
| Will Chan | Oct 18, 2012 10:29 am | |
| Kevin Kluge | Oct 18, 2012 11:10 am | |
| Joe Brockmeier | Oct 18, 2012 12:36 pm | |
| David Nalley | Oct 18, 2012 12:47 pm | |
| Marcus Sorensen | Oct 18, 2012 12:53 pm | |
| Edison Su | Oct 18, 2012 1:53 pm | |
| Joe Brockmeier | Oct 18, 2012 2:15 pm | |
| Edison Su | Oct 18, 2012 2:59 pm | |
| Chip Childers | Oct 18, 2012 3:04 pm | |
| Joe Brockmeier | Oct 18, 2012 4:06 pm | |
| Caleb Call | Oct 18, 2012 4:55 pm | |
| Sudha Ponnaganti | Oct 18, 2012 5:43 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Drop OVM in 4.0? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | David Nalley (dav...@gnsa.us) | |
| Date: | Oct 17, 2012 4:54:04 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.incubator.cloudstack-dev | |
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <Chir...@citrix.com> wrote:
+1 on fixing in a 4.0.x. We need to make some tough decisions if we want "time based releases". We already dropped AutoScale and Brocade even though they were essentially code-complete for this reason. This is an issue that is of uncertain size (weeks at least) to fix. There is just too much uncertainty. Also it seems that folks want the latest version of OVM anyway, which would not be helped by fixing this in 4.0
So I don't really know if I know enough to cast a vote either way. If this is something simple that can be fixed in a couple of days (including the licensing issues) - I'm for letting it remain a blocker. If it's 8 man-weeks of effort, well that's a different story.
--David