47 messages in com.googlegroups.android-developers[android-developers] Re: SDK Update?
FromSent OnAttachments
Gil09 May 2008 18:22 
Evan JIANG09 May 2008 18:55 
Adriano Crestani10 May 2008 07:19 
caliente10 May 2008 09:57 
Oscar Castaneda10 May 2008 10:16 
Biosopher11 May 2008 20:16 
maceghost17 Jun 2008 22:24 
Josh Guilfoyle27 Jun 2008 10:13 
Shane Isbell27 Jun 2008 13:10 
Shane Isbell27 Jun 2008 14:23 
gaso...@gmail.com28 Jun 2008 04:17 
plusminus28 Jun 2008 05:23 
Joa28 Jun 2008 08:37 
Romain Guy28 Jun 2008 11:02 
plusminus28 Jun 2008 11:20 
Mark Armendariz29 Jun 2008 02:49 
Joa29 Jun 2008 11:04 
André Charles Legendre29 Jun 2008 12:57 
Romain Guy29 Jun 2008 13:05 
David Given29 Jun 2008 14:18 
plusminus29 Jun 2008 16:17 
Joa29 Jun 2008 19:54 
André Charles Legendre29 Jun 2008 22:08 
André Charles Legendre29 Jun 2008 22:14 
Shane Isbell29 Jun 2008 22:41 
André Charles Legendre29 Jun 2008 23:28 
Joa30 Jun 2008 06:46 
Digit30 Jun 2008 07:11 
Mark Murphy30 Jun 2008 07:14 
Shane Isbell30 Jun 2008 08:36 
Mark Murphy30 Jun 2008 09:07 
Shane Isbell30 Jun 2008 09:23 
André Charles Legendre30 Jun 2008 09:35 
Joa30 Jun 2008 10:01 
André Charles Legendre30 Jun 2008 10:34 
Shane Isbell30 Jun 2008 11:00 
André Charles Legendre30 Jun 2008 11:40 
Mark Murphy30 Jun 2008 12:01 
Shane Isbell30 Jun 2008 12:02 
André Charles Legendre30 Jun 2008 12:31 
Joa30 Jun 2008 13:32 
Digit30 Jun 2008 14:33 
Bruno Sauer30 Jun 2008 15:07 
Joa30 Jun 2008 16:53 
Shane Isbell30 Jun 2008 17:06 
André Charles Legendre30 Jun 2008 22:56 
efon...@gmail.com01 Jul 2008 11:24 
Subject:[android-developers] Re: SDK Update?
From:Shane Isbell (shan@gmail.com)
Date:06/30/2008 09:23:34 AM
List:com.googlegroups.android-developers

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Mark Murphy <mmur@commonsware.com> wrote:

Thanks for that nugget of information Mr. Murphy, but really how am I to dig up a distribution I have no access to?

My point exactly.

I am merely pointing out that the download page that Romain said hosts Google's GPL code to hasn't been updated (since Feb. 08).

And if that's what you posted, I'd've had no quibble.

But you said (June 30th, 1:42am):

"Interesting point. It looks as though Google is releasing GPL modified code for public releases but not for the private, NDA distributions. "

Now that we are into the minutia, a git repository is not a distribution. And yes, I know that GPL does not require a distribution of code, just that the code is available. I am starting to feel like that Chaplin character that picked up the red flag in the "The Great Dictator"

Shane

And I'm looking for any proof backing up this statement.

I'm not saying you're wrong -- you could very well be right. But proof entails demonstrating that the "private, NDA distributions" are receiving binaries of GPLv2'd code that do not reflect the Git repository or the tarball.