atom feed22 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRe: Instafix for FreeBSD ports broken...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 1:47 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 1:50 am 
Matthew SeamanSep 29, 2011 2:01 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 2:07 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 2:18 am.diff
Erwin LansingSep 29, 2011 2:47 am 
Xin LISep 29, 2011 3:08 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 3:11 am 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 1:42 pm 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 1:46 pm 
Eitan AdlerSep 29, 2011 2:40 pm 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 4:12 pm 
Sergey V. DyatkoSep 29, 2011 11:28 pm 
Chris ReesSep 30, 2011 1:31 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 30, 2011 1:39 am 
Chris ReesSep 30, 2011 1:56 am 
Erwin LansingSep 30, 2011 2:09 am 
Jim TriggSep 30, 2011 2:09 pm 
Beech RintoulSep 30, 2011 2:50 pm 
Peter JeremyOct 1, 2011 2:36 pm 
Jilles TjoelkerOct 2, 2011 9:23 am 
Ed SchoutenOct 2, 2011 12:30 pm 
Subject:Re: Instafix for FreeBSD ports brokenness on 10.0?
From:Erwin Lansing (erw@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Sep 29, 2011 2:47:02 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:

Hi folks,

Why can't we simply fix the entire ports tree at once by doing something like this?

If we're not going to fiddle with auto* so close to a release date, we certainly are not going to fiddle with the whole ports infrastructure that affects even more ports, especially not for a workaround that only affects CURRENT users. Ports on CURRENT is only provided on a best effort basis and its users are expected to be techically savvy enough to work around these kinds of issues themselves.

We can always use more eyes on 9.0-BETA3 and as HEAD hasn't diverged that much, it would be nice if people installed the beta and reported any bugs found there.

Erwin

-- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erw@FreeBSD.org

_______________________________________________ free@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free@freebsd.org"