atom feed40 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: CFR: m_tag patch
FromSent OnAttachments
Sam LefflerOct 6, 2002 9:38 pm 
Nate LawsonOct 6, 2002 10:01 pm 
Sam LefflerOct 6, 2002 10:21 pm 
Terry LambertOct 6, 2002 11:09 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 6, 2002 11:32 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 12:29 am 
Sam LefflerOct 7, 2002 9:24 am 
Sam LefflerOct 7, 2002 9:31 am 
Sam LefflerOct 7, 2002 9:46 am 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 2:20 pm 
Terry LambertOct 7, 2002 3:34 pm 
Sam LefflerOct 7, 2002 3:52 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 4:10 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 4:22 pm 
Luigi RizzoOct 7, 2002 4:30 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 4:55 pm 
Sam LefflerOct 7, 2002 5:06 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 5:10 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 5:14 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 5:23 pm 
Terry LambertOct 7, 2002 5:31 pm 
Terry LambertOct 7, 2002 5:47 pm 
Nate LawsonOct 7, 2002 10:42 pm 
Don LewisOct 7, 2002 11:06 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 11:28 pm 
Julian ElischerOct 7, 2002 11:32 pm 
Terry LambertOct 8, 2002 12:42 am 
Terry LambertOct 8, 2002 12:53 am 
Harti BrandtOct 8, 2002 1:19 am 
Nate LawsonOct 8, 2002 11:25 am 
Don LewisOct 8, 2002 12:15 pm 
Sam LefflerOct 8, 2002 6:25 pm 
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉Oct 10, 2002 7:33 pm 
Sam LefflerOct 11, 2002 11:11 am 
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉Oct 16, 2002 3:03 am 
Luigi RizzoOct 16, 2002 7:45 am 
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉Oct 16, 2002 11:06 am 
Luigi RizzoOct 16, 2002 11:18 am 
Julian ElischerOct 16, 2002 11:24 am 
Sam LefflerOct 16, 2002 11:29 am 
Subject:Re: CFR: m_tag patch
From:Julian Elischer (jul@elischer.org)
Date:Oct 16, 2002 11:24:12 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:07:07AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote: ...

(I re-read the thread) perhaps the example in my previous message wasn't good (and it was at least incorrect). According to the discussion on the thread, we'll probably keep m_tag_cookie being 0 and use m_tag_id in (e.g.) ip6_output.c. So, we'll be happy if this convention is kept (and will be kept) at least under netinet6.

unfortunately this will not prevent code from having to check that the m_tag_cookie actually corresponds to the value you want, to make sure that your code does not misinterpret as own tags generated/destined to other clients.

Am I correct, Sam ?

yes but this is always done with macros, and the OpenBSD compatible macros also check for the correct cookie value.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message