13 messages in com.mysql.lists.javaRE: Problem with InnoDB| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dorel Vaida | 02 Dec 2002 02:49 | |
| Luca Lafranchi | 02 Dec 2002 03:21 | |
| Peter Brawley | 02 Dec 2002 06:15 | |
| Luca Lafranchi | 02 Dec 2002 06:41 | |
| Dorel Vaida | 02 Dec 2002 07:53 | |
| Sean Hager | 02 Dec 2002 08:38 | |
| A. Berger -- Onlynux | 02 Dec 2002 11:39 | |
| Andi S. Giri | 02 Dec 2002 18:16 | |
| Antoni Unkovich | 02 Dec 2002 18:40 | |
| Mark Matthews | 02 Dec 2002 19:26 | |
| Peter T. Abplanalp | 02 Dec 2002 22:29 | |
| Dorel Vaida | 02 Dec 2002 23:57 | |
| Dorel Vaida | 03 Dec 2002 07:29 |
| Subject: | RE: Problem with InnoDB![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Dorel Vaida (Dore...@ags.ro) |
| Date: | 12/02/2002 07:53:39 AM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.java |
It works now. It was a problem because both 3.XXX and 4.0.5 were installed and somehow the winsqladmin from 4.0.5 was starting 3.XXX instead of 4.0.5. Uninstalled, did a clean install and all runs, thank you.
BTW, does someone know about some production sites/applications that use MySQL 4.0.X ? I want to prove to my superiors that you don't have to pay thousands dollars for a "BIG BOS" server, you can use a smarter solution (e.g. MyQSL), it's all about what you want to do. And anyways I've seen some test that were showing MySQL going along Oracle and above all other servers so it is my believe that MySQL will become a equal/bigger competitor to any DB server on the market. Not mention the price that makes any others to look prohibitive.
Myself, I am amazed about MySQL 4.0.5 performance with InnoDB (interested in transactions too not only performance) table. I simply love it. Compared to other databases it's like you would go hunting with a lightweight, easy to use, deadly carabine (MySQL) compared with double barreled old heavy weapons that could kill a bear by hiting it not shooting it :-)




