| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 18, 2003 1:31 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Mar 19, 2003 3:12 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 19, 2003 8:35 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Mar 20, 2003 4:27 pm | |
| jmessing | Mar 20, 2003 4:46 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 20, 2003 7:41 pm | |
| jmessing | Mar 20, 2003 8:42 pm | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 21, 2003 7:09 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 21, 2003 7:36 am | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 21, 2003 3:10 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Mar 21, 2003 3:35 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Mar 21, 2003 4:07 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 21, 2003 6:24 pm | |
| Nick Pope | Mar 22, 2003 6:58 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 24, 2003 7:40 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 24, 2003 7:44 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 24, 2003 7:51 am | |
| Nick Pope | Mar 24, 2003 8:28 am | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 24, 2003 12:03 pm | |
| Gregor Karlinger | Mar 25, 2003 7:39 am | .bin |
| Gregor Karlinger | Mar 25, 2003 8:05 am | .bin |
| kare...@esat.kuleuven.ac.be | Mar 25, 2003 8:38 am | |
| Trevor Perrin | Mar 25, 2003 10:48 am | |
| Nick Pope | Mar 25, 2003 11:34 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Mar 27, 2003 11:08 am | |
| Gregor Karlinger | Mar 31, 2003 12:07 am | .bin |
| Nick Pope | Mar 31, 2003 4:42 am | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Apr 1, 2003 3:24 pm | |
| Karel Wouters | Apr 2, 2003 4:21 am | |
| Trevor Perrin | Apr 3, 2003 11:47 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Apr 3, 2003 11:49 am | |
| Robert Zuccherato | Apr 3, 2003 12:29 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Apr 3, 2003 2:06 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Apr 4, 2003 5:57 am | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Apr 4, 2003 3:00 pm | |
| Dimitri Andivahis | Apr 4, 2003 3:24 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Apr 4, 2003 11:39 pm | |
| Trevor Perrin | Apr 7, 2003 11:56 am |
| Subject: | RE: [dss] Timestamping | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Karel Wouters (Kare...@esat.kuleuven.ac.be) | |
| Date: | Apr 2, 2003 4:21:03 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.dss | |
Dimitri,
thanks for the clear text. Something like this should be included in the ISO document itself. (atmof, why didn't you include it ?)
I have some remarks/questions: You say:
In all linking schemes, simple or accumulated, if the verification result code is success, the timestamp is proved to have participated in the linking operation of the TSA at the time value included in the token itself.
doesn't this ignore the more powerful functionality of linking schemes? What you define here is linking schemes with absolute temporal authentication. Some authors of linking schemes have an entirely different approach: linking schemes are to be used for _relative_ temporal authentication, meaning that you can only compare two time-stamps. Moreover, absolute time indications can be inaccurate. A TSA could, for example, stop issuing time-stamps for an hour, and then continue with time-stamps backdated by an hour.
Just wondering, because some of those schemes (Lipmaa, Buldas et al. ) also fit into the ISO 18014-3 FCD.
Also, what about the patents by Surety on these schemes? (or: what are the "openly specified, reasonable, non-discriminatory terms." of Surety about this?)
Karel.






.bin