| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 10:08 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 10:15 am | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 10:54 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 11:15 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 11:42 am | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 11:43 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 11:45 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 11:52 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 11:57 am | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 12:02 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 12:23 pm | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 12:24 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 12:29 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 12:34 pm | |
| Luoqi Chen | Jun 20, 2000 12:35 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jun 20, 2000 12:35 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 12:36 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 12:36 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 12:38 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jun 20, 2000 12:40 pm | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 20, 2000 12:41 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 12:41 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 12:46 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 12:47 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 12:49 pm | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 20, 2000 12:50 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 12:53 pm | |
| Greg Lehey | Jun 20, 2000 12:58 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 1:08 pm | |
| Bart van Leeuwen | Jun 20, 2000 1:42 pm | |
| The Hermit Hacker | Jun 20, 2000 4:02 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 20, 2000 4:07 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 4:11 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 4:11 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jun 20, 2000 4:18 pm | |
| Jason Evans | Jun 20, 2000 11:52 pm | |
| Jason Evans | Jun 21, 2000 12:16 am | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 21, 2000 12:21 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jun 21, 2000 12:21 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 21, 2000 12:26 am | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 21, 2000 12:29 am | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jun 21, 2000 12:33 am | |
| Jason Evans | Jun 21, 2000 1:10 am | |
| Martin Cracauer | Jun 21, 2000 8:37 am | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jun 21, 2000 9:03 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Jun 21, 2000 9:54 am | |
| Arun Sharma | Jun 21, 2000 10:24 pm | |
| Terry Lambert | Jun 22, 2000 11:15 am |
| Subject: | Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Warner Losh (im...@village.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 20, 2000 12:41:55 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-smp | |
In message <5523...@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : The meaning here is: No, it can't be basically useless for months : on end, but yes, it may be dead for days or maybe even a week.
Yes. I agree. I have no problems with it being bolluxed up for 1 day or 1 week or even if it will gain us a lot, 2 weeks. Beyond that, it becomes too painful for me to use the tree. I susepct others would agree with threasholds in this general area, some tigheter some looser.
: I think I will agree that requiring UP to compile and work (for : the regular -current definition of "work") for at leat 80-90% : of the days is not an unreasonable requirement.
Yes. I object to having the tree be unusable for development work for "on the order of months" with no clear plan. It has taken me too many messages to reach this one sentence summary. Sorry about that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message





