atom feed161 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re...
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 15, 2009 8:52 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:24 am 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 8:32 am 
Loic KessousFeb 16, 2009 9:39 am 
cyrille henryFeb 16, 2009 9:52 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 16, 2009 9:57 am 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 10:07 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 16, 2009 11:40 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 11:59 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 12:01 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 1:28 pm 
Matt BarberFeb 16, 2009 1:32 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:45 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:57 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 2:04 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 2:52 pm 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 7:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 8:38 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 9:03 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 9:04 pm 
Matt BarberFeb 16, 2009 9:36 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:10 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:24 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:29 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:20 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:25 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:28 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:28 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:36 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:36 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:44 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:06 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 1:11 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:47 am 
Loic KessousFeb 17, 2009 1:48 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:52 am 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:24 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 4:27 am 
dmotdFeb 17, 2009 8:14 am 
Matt BarberFeb 17, 2009 8:17 am 
Matt BarberFeb 17, 2009 9:01 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:31 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:33 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:37 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:42 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:48 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 10:59 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 11:08 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 11:13 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:00 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:05 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:17 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:19 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:25 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:59 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 1:02 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 17, 2009 1:19 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:29 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:53 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:20 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:29 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:38 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 18, 2009 1:49 am.pd, .png
Frank BarknechtFeb 18, 2009 1:52 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 2:09 am 
Luke IanniniFeb 18, 2009 2:10 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 5:37 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:00 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 6:09 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:21 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 7:02 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:00 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:01 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:35 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:39 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:59 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 10:28 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:30 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:42 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:55 am 
81 later messages
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Feb 17, 2009 12:36:59 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 07:26 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: how can someone assume so? > no, that is so not true. i didn't even know, that zexy comes with their own version of [pack] and [unpack] until some weeks ago. and why the hell to they use the same names as internals? no, by no means i don't want to be forced to use the zexy version, just because some patches i use need zexy.

You have been forced to do so for many years, you just haven't been told about it until 0.42. I just now discovered that something is overwriting my [wrap]. I don't know yet which library does that. It would be nice if Pd could report the source library file together with the warning.

It's a difference between Pd >= 0.42 and Pd < 0.42. I don't think, overriding builtins ever worked with single-file externals,

that is what i am saying: this is introducing a _new_ incompatibility between pd-extended and pd vanilla.

Huh? The only "incompatibility" is the new *feature* of alias names for overwritten objects. 0.42's [pow~] or [abs~] also are a new *feature* implemented by popular demand. Loading libraries and the overwriting itself hasn't changed at all AFAIK. If you don't use the alias names, you don't have any problems.

but maybe I'm wrong. IOhannes? The overriding with lib-libraries works as before, additionally you now can use the builtins with an alias. That may not be the most pretty solution, but it doesn't break anything.

i neeed to use an alias when i want to use vanilla objects? this is simply insane.

I agree with you that external libraries generally shouldn't overwrite builtins. When using Cyclone for Max-importing it makes sense, though.

But IMO the aliasing is less insane than not being able to use the builtins at all, as is the case if you load object-overwriting-libraries like zexy or cyclone in any Pd version before 0.42, including pd-extended.

Note that here I use libraries in the "-lib"-loading many-externals-in-one-file sense here, not in the sense where everything (libs, singles, abstractions, "libdirs") is called a library and setting a path is called "loading a library".

Ciao