atom feed25 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: A hardware question
FromSent OnAttachments
mikeApr 27, 2008 12:36 am 
Dave CheneyApr 27, 2008 1:21 am 
mikeApr 27, 2008 1:58 am 
Dave CheneyApr 27, 2008 2:11 am 
mikeApr 27, 2008 1:34 pm 
Janko HauserApr 27, 2008 1:44 pm 
Igor SysoevApr 27, 2008 9:34 pm 
mikeApr 27, 2008 10:52 pm 
Igor SysoevApr 27, 2008 11:05 pm 
Chavelle VincentApr 28, 2008 3:16 am 
Igor SysoevApr 28, 2008 7:10 am 
mikeApr 28, 2008 11:45 am 
kinglerApr 28, 2008 12:03 pm 
mikeApr 28, 2008 12:26 pm 
Ezra ZygmuntowiczApr 29, 2008 3:11 pm 
mikeApr 29, 2008 4:55 pm 
mikeApr 29, 2008 7:25 pm 
mikeApr 29, 2008 9:11 pm 
Manlio PerilloApr 30, 2008 1:11 am 
mikeApr 30, 2008 2:09 am 
Manlio PerilloMay 1, 2008 2:47 am 
mikeMay 1, 2008 8:17 am 
mikeMay 1, 2008 3:11 pm 
Eden LiMay 1, 2008 6:31 pm 
mikeMay 1, 2008 7:03 pm 
Subject:Re: A hardware question
From:Janko Hauser (jh-/@public.gmane.org)
Date:Apr 27, 2008 1:44:39 pm
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Am 27.04.2008 um 22:35 schrieb mike:

Understood. I don't -want- to use NFS, but nobody else has given me any other options. I tried iSCSI+OCFS2, and that had some odd issues and I am not sure it was reliable enough for a low-latency web environment with millions of files.

I'm pretty OCD, I'd like all my machines to match, and I have the ability right now to get them synced up before I start using them.

Also, would FreeBSD or Linux be better for the dual or quad core? Last answer I got was nginx probably works better under FBSD. NFS works better under FBSD too. My NFS server is already FBSD...

We are using AFS (Andrew File System), which can have big caches on every machine and it performs very well, although it was a little bit problematic to setup. There are now 60GB of data in the AFS, but only a fraction is daily served.

HTH,

__Janko