17 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: Use of new_instance(...
FromSent OnAttachments
Phillip J. Eby27 Mar 2008 11:51 
jason kirtland27 Mar 2008 12:01 
Michael Bayer27 Mar 2008 12:10 
Michael Bayer27 Mar 2008 12:42 
Phillip J. Eby27 Mar 2008 14:06 
jason kirtland27 Mar 2008 14:25 
Phillip J. Eby27 Mar 2008 17:38 
jason kirtland27 Mar 2008 18:08 
Phillip J. Eby27 Mar 2008 21:54 
Michael Bayer28 Mar 2008 06:44 
Phillip J. Eby28 Mar 2008 07:57 
Michael Bayer28 Mar 2008 08:37 
jason kirtland28 Mar 2008 08:55 
Phillip J. Eby28 Mar 2008 09:13 
jason kirtland28 Mar 2008 09:26 
Michael Bayer28 Mar 2008 09:28 
Michael Bayer28 Mar 2008 09:53 
Subject:[sqlalchemy] Re: Use of new_instance() in the user-defined-state branch?
From:jason kirtland (je@discorporate.us)
Date:03/28/2008 09:26:05 AM
List:com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy

Phillip J. Eby wrote:

So you're still disagreeing with Jason, who's quite explicitly saying that SA's __init__ will blow up if it gets called. Which of you is right?

__init__ will register a default InstanceState on the instance, and doing so from new_instance will hose a variety of things I'm working on in the branch.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqla@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqla@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---