| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 3, 2012 2:50 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 3, 2012 3:42 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 12:48 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 11:13 am | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 11:59 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 12:36 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 6, 2012 3:08 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 9, 2012 2:45 pm |
| Subject: | Re: strict DMI | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andreas Sachs (andi...@gmx.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 9, 2012 2:45:38 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.dev | |
I created one before you: 3735
I will write a comment, that it is a duplicate.
Thanks for the fix in 2.3.2
Andi
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:09:08 -0800 Von: John Lindal <supp...@newplanetsoftware.com> An: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org> Betreff: Re: strict DMI
I created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3740
John
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Andreas Sachs wrote:
Hi John, thanks for the clarification.
But to come back to my original question: Why is <allowed-methods> not available for wildcard method invocation? Even you expected that it is available (your first post).
Allowed-methods would be a good possibility to limit the wildcard to some method names.
Or is there another possibility to do something like this: <action name="(Method1|Method2|Method3)Crud" class="example.Crud" method="{1}">
i expected:
<action name="*Crud" class="example.Crud" method="{1}"> <allowed-methods>Method1,Method2,Method3</allowed-methods>
Thanks for your work Andi
-- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
-- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de





