| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Edwin Groothuis | Oct 22, 2004 12:45 am | |
| Frank Laszlo | Oct 22, 2004 7:36 am | |
| Adam Weinberger | Oct 22, 2004 7:36 am | |
| Robin Schoonover | Oct 22, 2004 9:01 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 9:16 am | |
| Benjamin Lutz | Oct 22, 2004 9:23 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 9:24 am | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 22, 2004 9:32 am | |
| Mike Edenfield | Oct 22, 2004 9:33 am | |
| Oliver Lehmann | Oct 22, 2004 9:46 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 10:41 am | |
| Lowell Gilbert | Oct 22, 2004 1:07 pm | |
| Lowell Gilbert | Oct 22, 2004 1:08 pm | |
| Paul Chvostek | Oct 22, 2004 1:14 pm | |
| Robin Schoonover | Oct 22, 2004 3:52 pm | |
| Christopher Nehren | Oct 22, 2004 3:54 pm | |
| Paul Chvostek | Oct 22, 2004 5:17 pm | |
| Parv | Oct 22, 2004 6:55 pm | |
| Jim Trigg | Oct 22, 2004 8:26 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 24, 2004 8:24 am | |
| Jose M Rodriguez | Oct 24, 2004 8:47 am | |
| Jie Gao | Oct 26, 2004 12:40 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 12:47 pm | |
| Matt Douhan | Oct 26, 2004 12:54 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 1:01 pm | |
| Jie Gao | Oct 26, 2004 4:19 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 26, 2004 5:59 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 26, 2004 6:01 pm | |
| Benjamin Lutz | Oct 26, 2004 7:13 pm | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 26, 2004 7:49 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 8:12 pm | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 26, 2004 8:35 pm | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 26, 2004 8:41 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 9:03 pm | |
| Matthew Seaman | Oct 27, 2004 1:17 am | |
| Frank J. Laszlo | Oct 27, 2004 4:02 am | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 27, 2004 7:07 am | |
| Roman Neuhauser | Nov 9, 2004 5:11 pm | |
| Radek Kozlowski | Nov 9, 2004 5:31 pm | |
| Roman Neuhauser | Nov 10, 2004 4:59 pm |
| Subject: | ports/www is too full | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Frank Laszlo (lasz...@vonostingroup.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 22, 2004 7:36:26 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
Ports/www is too full: 755 ports.
I have kind of sorted (partly brute-force, partly eye-work) and came up with the attached splits:
www-servers 48 www-servers-modules 115 www-proxy 27
www-browsers 77
www-apps 26 www-apps-cms 24 www-apps-images 13 www-apps-rss 9 www-apps-wiki 21 www-apps-zope 41
www-devel 11 www-devel-perl 176 www-devel-php 19 www-devel-python 12 www-devel-ruby 11
www-editors 29 www-log 27 www-ml 17 www-spiders 25
www-misc 19
www 0
I'm missing 8 ports somewhere, but the idea is there. Of course these categories aren't written in stone and I'm not going to defend them regiously[sp], but it gives an idea what is there.
Maybe even splitting pf www-servers*, www-clients and www-proxy
I am willing to volunteer for this job, but I think it's more the cvsmeisters which will curse than I am.
Comments? Remarks? Support? Ideas? Hostile takeovers?
Edwin
This sounds like a good idea to me, But I dont know if it should be broken down to such an extreme. Maybe just break up the "big ones" and create a www-misc for everything else. Just my 2 cents.
Regards, Frank





