15 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: Problems using au...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| cc | Oct 2, 2002 7:20 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Oct 2, 2002 7:45 pm | |
| Zenon Panoussis | Oct 2, 2002 8:16 pm | |
| Barry Hensley | Oct 2, 2002 8:47 pm | |
| cc | Oct 3, 2002 4:13 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Oct 3, 2002 4:47 am | |
| Brian Candler | Oct 3, 2002 5:59 am | |
| cc | Oct 3, 2002 7:15 am | |
| Brian Candler | Oct 3, 2002 9:05 am | |
| cc | Oct 3, 2002 9:46 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Oct 3, 2002 2:48 pm | |
| cc | Oct 3, 2002 3:21 pm | |
| Bill Schindler | Oct 3, 2002 3:35 pm | |
| Jonas Printzén (Hemma) | Oct 4, 2002 1:37 am | |
| cc | Oct 4, 2002 3:47 pm |
| Subject: | [courier-users] Re: Problems using authenticated ESMTP | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | cc (cc...@dsc.net) | |
| Date: | Oct 4, 2002 3:47:41 pm | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users | |
Bill Schindler writes:
From the Install document at http://courier.sourceforge.net/install.html under the bold "OPTIONAL: Configure ESMTP authentication and SSL" heading...
"Courier supports authenticated ESMTP in order to grant ESMTP relaying privileges to remote users. The following steps set up authenticated ESMTP:
..."
Which is followed by the instructions on enabling it.
Sorry Bill, I misunderstood. I thought Sam was talking about the configuration file generated by running 'configure'. *That* was what I couldn't find a reference to in the INSTALL file (i.e. what option to pass to ./configure to enable ESMTP). I was thrown by his comment because I mentioned earlier in the thread that I had set up the esmtpd configuration as instructed (and posted it) and also I understood that enabling authentication for incoming SMTP was not what I wanted as that would mean *all* connections needed authentication. For these reasons I didn't think he was talking about the esmtpd configuration file, which is indeed documented as you describe.
Anyway, as I said elsewhere, it works now, since I generated that certificate. I see someone else on the list found a solution by building via the RPM's, so perhaps there is a glitch in regular build process?
Thanks for your timely responses anyway.