29 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Proposed extensio...
FromSent OnAttachments
Matthias WimmerSep 25, 2007 5:17 pm 
Tim LythSep 25, 2007 6:04 pm 
Alessandro VeselySep 26, 2007 12:18 am 
Matthias WimmerSep 26, 2007 3:07 am 
Gordon MessmerSep 26, 2007 1:12 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 26, 2007 3:54 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 26, 2007 11:06 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 4:37 am 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 6:12 am 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 8:04 am 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 2:59 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 3:19 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 3:25 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 3:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 4:10 pm 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 4:32 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 4:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 4:58 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 10:05 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 10:07 pm 
Alessandro VeselySep 28, 2007 1:25 am 
Julian MehnleNov 12, 2007 2:52 am 
Sam VarshavchikNov 12, 2007 3:59 am 
Julian MehnleMar 5, 2008 7:03 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 5, 2008 7:59 am 
Bernd WurstMar 5, 2008 8:54 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 5, 2008 9:32 am 
Julian MehnleMar 5, 2008 9:54 am 
Sam VarshavchikMar 5, 2008 4:24 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Proposed extension: SKIPMAILFILTER [patch]Actions...
From:Gordon Messmer (yiny@eburg.com)
Date:Sep 27, 2007 4:32:13 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Matthias Wimmer writes:

Sam Varshavchik schrieb:

Sam, please clarify this: Is there an intended "u" line in the control file? Is it present in only newer or older releases? Why is this undocumented and only working for me?

It's comparatively new, and is not present in the older releases. Yes, it needs to be documented.

Since which version is this present? I am working with version 0.56.0 and do not see this line.

You should be, it's been added in 0.49.

As far as I can tell, filters won't see the COMCTLFILE_MSGSOURCE (u) line *most* of the time. It'll be in the first control file if there were enough recipients to require more than one, but otherwise the line is written after the filters are run.

Sam, you've mentioned before that refactoring the code to run filters after rewriting the message would be difficult, but wouldn't you just need to move the "run_filter" block of code later in SubmitFile::MessageEnd? That would give filters access to the COMCTLFILE_MSGSOURCE line and other information written by SubmitFile::closectl, and also potentially allow filters to rewrite message bodies more easily.