atom feed45 messages in org.apache.shale.devRe: Source Repository Organization an...
FromSent OnAttachments
Craig McClanahanJul 16, 2006 10:04 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 17, 2006 7:23 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 17, 2006 8:11 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 17, 2006 9:19 pm 
James MitchellJul 18, 2006 6:22 am 
Greg ReddinJul 18, 2006 11:02 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 2:20 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 2:52 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 18, 2006 4:46 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 18, 2006 4:53 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 5:30 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 18, 2006 5:39 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 19, 2006 7:09 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 8:03 am 
James MitchellJul 19, 2006 9:25 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 10:36 am 
Gary VanMatreJul 19, 2006 10:58 am 
James MitchellJul 19, 2006 11:13 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 19, 2006 1:42 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 1:54 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 19, 2006 2:15 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 19, 2006 2:34 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 3:41 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 19, 2006 9:37 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 9:44 am 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 12:48 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 1:23 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 2:02 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 4:32 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 10:49 pm 
James MitchellJul 23, 2006 11:01 am 
Greg ReddinJul 23, 2006 2:36 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 23, 2006 5:02 pm 
James MitchellJul 25, 2006 7:07 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 25, 2006 9:24 am 
James MitchellJul 27, 2006 9:41 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 28, 2006 8:20 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 6:17 am 
Wendy SmoakJul 29, 2006 6:59 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 9:48 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 10:18 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 10:23 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 5:30 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 9:32 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 30, 2006 4:46 pm 
Subject:Re: Source Repository Organization and Release Strategy Thoughts
From:Sean Schofield (sean@gmail.com)
Date:Jul 29, 2006 5:30:17 pm
List:org.apache.shale.dev

Why is CDDL an issue? That was on Cliff's list of acceptable licenses.

I wasn't sure which licenses were cool and which weren't.

Google also just announced that they're going to do hosting of open source prrojects[1]. They are in the early days (don't even have infrastructure in place for downloading releases yet), but it has some interesting ideas. If you like labels in GMail, you'll like their approach to issue tracking. (By the way, Greg Stein is the engineering manager at Google for this project.)

I really like JIRA but I'd be curious to see what their alternative for issue tracking is. My instinct is to stick with a more established host since we'd like this to be available and we'd like it to be easy for people to access it. I'm not wild about Sourceforge. What do you think about java.net? I'm sure you investigated it when you were considering Shale options.

By the way, are you aware of any Apache restrictions on using depedencies like Hibernate in Maven? It seems like excluding them from the default build would be a idiotic policy. With everyone switching to Maven now, it would just push projects that want to use Maven right out of the ASF.

I tried to register "shale" as a project, but they've got an interesting twist in the signup process ... if you duplicate the name of an existing SourceForge project, they ask the owner of that project for an ok (on the theory that you might just be trying to do a "land grab" on the project names. We could undoubltedly do "shale-goodies" or "shale-petstore" or whatever there, if we wanted.

Is Shale a sourceforge project?

Craig

Sean