atom feed42 messages in org.w3.www-tagRe: XML-SW, a thought experiment
FromSent OnAttachments
Tim BrayFeb 6, 2002 8:42 pm 
David OrchardFeb 6, 2002 10:00 pm 
Jacek KopeckyFeb 7, 2002 3:02 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 7, 2002 4:14 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 7, 2002 4:17 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 7, 2002 4:28 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 7, 2002 4:51 am 
Tim BrayFeb 7, 2002 10:12 am 
Tim BrayFeb 7, 2002 10:13 am 
Piotr KaminskiFeb 8, 2002 4:34 am 
Tim Berners-LeeFeb 12, 2002 12:03 pm 
Paul PrescodFeb 12, 2002 2:21 pm 
Norman WalshFeb 12, 2002 2:29 pm 
Dan ConnollyFeb 12, 2002 2:33 pm 
Simon St.LaurentFeb 12, 2002 3:05 pm 
Simon St.LaurentFeb 12, 2002 3:46 pm 
Martin DuerstFeb 12, 2002 4:00 pm 
Jacek KopeckyFeb 13, 2002 4:53 am 
Norman WalshFeb 13, 2002 7:00 am 
Jacek KopeckyFeb 13, 2002 7:40 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 13, 2002 8:07 am 
Norman WalshFeb 13, 2002 8:14 am 
Jacek KopeckyFeb 13, 2002 10:05 am 
Paul PrescodFeb 13, 2002 10:27 am 
MURATA MakotoFeb 13, 2002 6:12 pm 
Rick JelliffeFeb 13, 2002 11:38 pm 
Norman WalshFeb 14, 2002 6:07 am 
Jun FujisawaFeb 16, 2002 5:44 am 
Tim Berners-LeeFeb 22, 2002 7:56 am 
Eric van der VlistFeb 22, 2002 8:07 am 
Eric van der VlistFeb 23, 2002 1:23 am 
Piotr KaminskiFeb 23, 2002 3:18 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 23, 2002 9:06 am 
Paul PrescodFeb 23, 2002 9:31 am 
Eric van der VlistFeb 23, 2002 12:01 pm 
Piotr KaminskiFeb 23, 2002 3:47 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 23, 2002 4:26 pm 
Piotr KaminskiFeb 23, 2002 5:21 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 23, 2002 7:36 pm 
Tim Berners-LeeMar 4, 2002 11:40 am 
Tim Berners-LeeMar 4, 2002 1:14 pm 
Rick JelliffeMar 25, 2002 7:00 am 
Subject:Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment
From:MURATA Makoto (mmur@trl.ibm.co.jp)
Date:Feb 13, 2002 6:12:48 pm
List:org.w3.www-tag

I like this draft.

Here is a list of the relevant errata for the second edition (http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata).

E5 E11 E12 E13 the last change of E15 E17 E22 E23 E24 E26 (for the xml:base attribute) E27 E28

While preparing a Japanese translation of XML2e, I sent many comments to the xml-editor mailing list. Two of them are relevant.

- Now that ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has been published, XML 1.0 should reference to it.

- "whose canonical (UCS-4) code value" is misleading. One could argue that the UCS-4 code value after character normalization is mentioned.

-- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M@asahi-net.or.jp>