8 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] courier & pam
FromSent OnAttachments
nicholas coleJul 11, 2000 12:57 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 11, 2000 2:57 pm 
nicholas coleJul 11, 2000 3:01 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 11, 2000 3:35 pm 
nicholas coleJul 14, 2000 4:18 pm 
Michael S. FischerJul 14, 2000 4:23 pm 
nicholas coleJul 14, 2000 4:35 pm 
HIROSHI OOTAJul 14, 2000 5:58 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] courier & pamActions...
From:HIROSHI OOTA (oo@LSi.nec.co.jp)
Date:Jul 14, 2000 5:58:19 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Hello,

At Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:18:23 -0700 (PDT), nicholas cole <ni@profile.com> wrote:

This message is getting kinda messy...I figured out that PAM's pam_sm_open_session and close_session are only in versions of PAM 0.59 or later, and I've been told that FreeBSD 4 uses PAM 0.56, so I think that explains the problem. From what I've read in pam's docs, pam_unix.so now handles all 4 auth taks (including session).

Hmm, FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE which I am using, uses PAM 0.65. Now I am using authpam and courier-imap under FreeBSD 4.0-R without modification. It works fine.

-------------------------------------------- uname -a FreeBSD xxx 4.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Apr 8 02:49:15 JST 2000 xxx
i386

/usr/src/contrib/libpam/README # # $Id: README,v 1.14 1997/04/05 07:04:46 morgan Exp $ #

Hello!

Thanks for downloading Linux-PAM-0.65.

--------------------------------------------

Hope this help

--

HIROSHI OOTA oo@LSi.nec.co.jp