15 messages in com.googlegroups.pylons-discussRe: Routes user survey| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mike Orr | 23 Nov 2007 01:36 | |
| Marcin Kasperski | 23 Nov 2007 04:30 | |
| Paweł Stradomski | 23 Nov 2007 05:46 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Nov 2007 05:50 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Nov 2007 06:06 | |
| Paweł Stradomski | 23 Nov 2007 06:18 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Nov 2007 07:31 | |
| Paweł Stradomski | 23 Nov 2007 07:34 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Nov 2007 08:37 | |
| Jose Galvez | 23 Nov 2007 10:34 | |
| Ben Bangert | 23 Nov 2007 15:34 | |
| Ian Bicking | 23 Nov 2007 21:56 | |
| Andrew Smart | 24 Nov 2007 11:04 | |
| Ian Bicking | 24 Nov 2007 13:59 | |
| Mike Orr | 26 Nov 2007 16:16 |
| Subject: | Re: Routes user survey![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Marcin Kasperski (Marc...@public.gmane.org) |
| Date: | 11/23/2007 04:30:01 AM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.pylons-discuss |
redirect routes need some detailed design.
a) There should be an easy way to define internal redirects. Important thing here is that the destination url should be defined using routes by itself. I am not sure about the syntax, but url_for need not be available at the moment (for example, if redirects need to be defined earlier than the destination routes)
b) There should be some explicit way of selecting which kind of redirect is to be performed (permanent, temporary, ...).
c) In case of internal redirects it may make sense to handle 'invisible redirect' (just picking the destination object using the redirected-to route without generating any redirect to the browser) as one of the methods.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marcin Kasperski | People resist change, regardless of what | http://mekk.waw.pl | it is. (Michael Reed) | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------




