atom feed8 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackerslibthread 1:1 threads
FromSent OnAttachments
David LeimbachApr 22, 2005 8:41 am 
Julian ElischerApr 22, 2005 12:42 pm 
David LeimbachApr 22, 2005 3:01 pm 
Jas arlerrApr 23, 2005 5:09 am 
Lyndon NerenbergApr 23, 2005 5:09 am 
David LeimbachApr 23, 2005 7:30 am 
Julian ElischerApr 23, 2005 7:31 am 
Kostik BelousovApr 25, 2005 12:37 am 
Subject:libthread 1:1 threads
From:Julian Elischer (jul@elischer.org)
Date:Apr 23, 2005 7:31:11 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:

--On 2005-4-22 3:02 PM -0700 David Leimbach <dlei@gmail.com> wrote:

According to the man page, and plan 9 where rfork originated you can use it to modify an extant process. In fact you have to set the RFPROC flag to make a new process or all the changes apply to the current one.

Unfortunately the semantics of FreeBSD rfork() have diverted far enough from the original plan9 rfork() such that you can't consider it as the same call. This makes life miserable for things like running Inferno on FreeBSD.

patches to fix this would probably be accepted.. as long as other functionality wask kept 'available'

--lyndon

_______________________________________________ free@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free@freebsd.org"