Messages per Month
21 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devRe: Incremental Field Updates| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Shai Erera | Apr 25, 2010 4:32 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 5, 2010 8:54 am | |
| Shai Erera | May 5, 2010 10:17 am | |
| Babak Farhang | May 8, 2010 11:39 pm | |
| Shai Erera | May 8, 2010 11:49 pm | |
| Babak Farhang | May 9, 2010 12:31 am | |
| Shai Erera | May 9, 2010 4:38 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 10, 2010 12:43 am | |
| Shai Erera | May 10, 2010 1:04 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 10, 2010 1:40 am | |
| Babak Farhang | May 10, 2010 9:22 pm | |
| Shai Erera | May 10, 2010 9:26 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | May 11, 2010 12:40 pm | |
| Babak Farhang | May 12, 2010 2:27 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 12, 2010 2:55 am | |
| Jan Høydahl / Cominvent | Oct 7, 2010 1:59 am | |
| Shai Erera | Oct 7, 2010 2:06 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | May 23, 2011 9:07 am | |
| Shai Erera | May 23, 2011 11:24 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 23, 2011 12:03 pm | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | May 23, 2011 12:45 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Incremental Field Updates | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Grant Ingersoll (gsin...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | May 11, 2010 12:40:22 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.solr-dev | |
On May 11, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
but because of the cost of preparing the inputs (i.e. text extraction) to Lucene.
You're right ! That and also the cost of fetching the document, in systems where
the content lives on other servers/systems. Reindexing is usually (depends on
your analysis chain) the cheapest step.
Depends on the type of application, though, I suppose. Many times the thing
being updated is just a number, like a rating/price/inventory as well, in which
case there is very little analysis. Of course, it raises an interesting point,
what are the implications for numeric fields?
-Grant