atom feed18 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: Include file search path
FromSent OnAttachments
md...@FreeBSD.orgMar 29, 2011 2:20 pm 
John BaldwinMar 30, 2011 4:59 am 
Arnaud LacombeMar 30, 2011 8:04 am 
Dimitry AndricMar 30, 2011 8:23 am 
Nathan WhitehornMar 30, 2011 8:26 am 
Dimitry AndricMar 30, 2011 8:45 am 
Warner LoshMar 30, 2011 10:53 am 
Robert WatsonApr 2, 2011 11:29 am 
Warner LoshApr 2, 2011 11:47 am 
Robert N. M. WatsonApr 2, 2011 12:09 pm 
Warner LoshApr 2, 2011 3:48 pm 
Arnaud LacombeMay 22, 2011 8:47 pm 
Warner LoshMay 31, 2011 9:23 am 
Arnaud LacombeJun 6, 2011 2:37 pm 
Arnaud LacombeJun 25, 2011 11:00 am 
Arnaud LacombeJul 8, 2011 2:16 pm 
Arnaud LacombeSep 14, 2011 8:23 pm 
Garrett CooperNov 16, 2011 10:43 am 
Subject:Re: Include file search path
From:Arnaud Lacombe (laco@gmail.com)
Date:Sep 14, 2011 8:23:08 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <laco@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <laco@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <laco@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <im@bsdimp.com> wrote:

On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:

Hi Warner,

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <im@bsdimp.com> wrote:

On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:

On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:

(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD.  This seems like a basic  requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a  resolved issue?

0 work has been done here to my knowledge.  The world view for clang and our
in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge.

That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build
integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM?

Yes.  The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a little
different.

We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64-bit MIPS
platform.  We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot loader work, and plan
to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year.  The base system seems a bit
short on detail when it comes to the above, currently.

Yes.  I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to building with
xdev compilers.  A similar number are needed to make it easy to configure and
add systree support, I think.

Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just works"
state with regard to this?

I sure hope so.  I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan.

BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ?

It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree.  Needs about 4 hours
of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting busier than I
expected.

any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final commit ?

ping ?

ping ?

ping, Warner ?

FWIW, I guess that in 4 months, either you had time to finish the patch, or I could have found to time to complete it myself based on your incomplete version. I'd really be interested to benchmark recent, decent, compiler.

Thanks, - Arnaud