11 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-scsiRe: Heavy CAM Problems...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Alain Hebert | Aug 7, 1998 1:17 pm | |
| Justin T. Gibbs | Aug 7, 1998 5:29 pm | |
| Rolf Larsson | Aug 8, 1998 2:55 am | |
| Alain Hebert | Aug 9, 1998 6:35 pm | |
| Miroslav Kes | Aug 10, 1998 1:17 am | |
| Justin T. Gibbs | Aug 10, 1998 10:43 pm | |
| Miroslav Kes | Aug 11, 1998 2:00 am | |
| Alain Hebert | Aug 11, 1998 7:20 am | |
| Justin T. Gibbs | Aug 11, 1998 12:06 pm | |
| Alain Hebert | Aug 11, 1998 11:42 pm | |
| Miroslav Kes | Aug 12, 1998 4:03 am |
| Subject: | Re: Heavy CAM Problems... | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Justin T. Gibbs (gib...@narnia.plutotech.com) | |
| Date: | Aug 11, 1998 12:06:00 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-scsi | |
In article <35D0...@pubnix.net> you wrote:
Hi!
Nope... Didn't change anything... But!
I was wondering... Your patch mention that fix should be applied to line 1383 to a 1.77 aic7xxx.seq (right)... 1.77 after the CAM patch has 1455 and the line that match the context of your last mail is located at 1124?!?
I have lots of other changes to that file right now, mostly having to do with target mode. Development goes on, you know.
Maybe you and us are not really synced correctly since the 0712 diffs... If you want you can ship the RCS file of aic7xxx.seq and I'll rollback all revision to find out when it happen...
Perforce uses a combination RCS file/database approach. Shipping you a single file that you can decifer isn't really possible. I looked at all changes to the file and the only other change couldn't have any affect on this problem. It is likely other optimizations in the kernel driver file that have changed the transaction queuing rate and caused the problem to show up. The Adaptec folk seem to feel that this error could only be caused hardware.
-- Justin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message