8 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRe: openSTA - WAS RE: [Webtest] load ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Goeschl Siegfried | 14 Jan 2003 00:53 | |
| Christian Sell | 14 Jan 2003 04:38 | |
| Bernhard Wagner | 14 Jan 2003 05:23 | |
| Christian Sell | 14 Jan 2003 06:05 | |
| Goeschl Siegfried | 14 Jan 2003 06:29 | |
| Bernhard Wagner | 15 Jan 2003 10:34 | |
| Jeffrey D. Brekke | 15 Jan 2003 10:41 | |
| Christian Sell | 15 Jan 2003 10:44 |
| Subject: | Re: openSTA - WAS RE: [Webtest] load tests with WebTest![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Christian Sell (chri...@netcologne.de) |
| Date: | 01/14/2003 04:38:28 AM |
| List: | com.canoo.lists.webtest |
thats the beauty of HttpUnit/WebTest: I can tell it to "click on the link which includes the String XXX". It will then parse the response and find the appropriate link (including dynamically generated parameters) and create a request from it - just as if a user clicked on it. No issues with session Ids and the like... Only drawback is I have no recording facility
Goeschl Siegfried wrote:
A comment from a Canoo Webtest novice and former openSTA expert
openSTA is a very powerful tool and it allows to test applications with dynamic
URLs, i.e. URLs containing a unique session id. At this point you get stuck with
simple Capture and Replay Tool. You can solve that problem with a little bit of
coding with openSTA while Mega-$$ tools do that magic automatically
Thanks
Siegfried Goeschl sieg...@it20one.at
-----Original Message----- From: Christian Sell [mailto:chri...@netcologne.de] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:46 PM To: webt...@gate.canoo.com Subject: Re: [Webtest] load tests with WebTest
one more word to this, for fairness' sake:
looks like a powerful tool - much more powerful than I require. If I needed all that, and the tool delivers to its promises, it would probably be worth setting up/dedicating a windoze machine
thanks anyway..
Mike Lecza wrote:
Consider taking a look at OpenSTA.org for load testing. Its pretty good for free :-).
Regards
-----Original Message----- From: webt...@gate.canoo.com [mailto:webt...@gate.canoo.com] On Behalf Of Christian Sell Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:46 AM To: webt...@gate.canoo.com Subject: Re: [Webtest] load tests with WebTest
no please dont mention JMeter (admit, I should have done that). I tried it, and it was so pathetic that I went on looking, and ended up with Webtest.
JMeters test scenario setup is extremely clumsy, and the app is unacceptably buggy and slow... sorry to say that..
Torben Tretau wrote:
Hi,
However, I would like to use it not only to test my web pages functionally, but also with respect to throughput and behavior under load. I am therefore thinking of an extension that would allow me to specify the number of concurrent sessions to create, and some load/throughput-based reporting features.
One solution could be to simulate load with JMeter and test in
parallel
with Webtest.. I sometimes patched my Webtest so a timeout could be added for each task to be fulfilled.. But I have not tried the
solution
with JMeter..
Torben
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest




