atom feed11 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-1 test...
FromSent OnAttachments
Miller PucketteNov 6, 2011 10:55 pm 
João PaisNov 7, 2011 4:00 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 7, 2011 4:24 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 7, 2011 7:43 am 
Roman HaefeliNov 11, 2011 4:57 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 11, 2011 8:05 am 
Roman HaefeliNov 13, 2011 6:58 am 
Miller PucketteNov 13, 2011 9:17 am 
Mathieu BouchardNov 13, 2011 9:55 am 
Roman HaefeliNov 13, 2011 11:45 am 
Mathieu BouchardNov 13, 2011 12:55 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-1 test 5 released
From:Roman Haefeli (redu@gmail.com)
Date:Nov 11, 2011 4:57:49 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Hi Miller

On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 22:55 -0800, Miller Puckette wrote:

Another test version... I still am working on 2 bugs.

The biggest change is that I updated tcl/tk to version 8.5 in the Windows compiled package.

It's on the usual http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm or:

git clone git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pure-data

It seems that test5 is crashing in certain circumstances during patch editing, where test4 is not crashing under the exact same circumstances.

What happens is that when I change the arguments of a certain abstraction and the click to the empty canvas to let it re-instantiate with the new arguments, Pd segfaults. Also, when editing that said abstraction (many instances are used in the patch) and then saving it, Pd segfaults.

Since this happens in a not so small project, isolating the problem and creating a small test patch could be quite time consuming. Would a gdb traceback already help to track it down?

This on Ubntu 11.04 with Pd-0.43.1test5.

Sorry for this vague bug report. I thought it's better to mention it even when I cannot provide enough useful information yet.

Roman