atom feed48 messages in net.java.dev.jugs.jug-leaders[jug-leaders] Re: That's bad for JavaFx
FromSent OnAttachments
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 7:48 am 
Tobias FrechAug 6, 2012 8:28 am 
Marcos EliziarioAug 6, 2012 8:32 am 
Frank GrecoAug 6, 2012 8:37 am 
Marcos EliziarioAug 6, 2012 8:53 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 8:54 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 6, 2012 8:57 am 
John YearyAug 7, 2012 4:54 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 7, 2012 5:26 am 
Donald SmithAug 7, 2012 5:46 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 8, 2012 12:28 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 12:37 am.png
Baptiste MATHUSAug 16, 2012 12:52 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 8:10 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 8:12 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 8:13 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 8:33 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 9:16 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:37 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:41 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 9:42 am 
Frank GrecoAug 16, 2012 9:45 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:53 am 
Bruno F. SouzaAug 16, 2012 9:58 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 10:25 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 10:26 am 
Donald SmithAug 16, 2012 10:46 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 1:06 pm 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 7:35 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 16, 2012 9:49 pm 
Frans ThamuraAug 16, 2012 9:55 pm 
Baptiste MATHUSAug 16, 2012 10:06 pm 
Manfred MoserAug 16, 2012 10:39 pm 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 17, 2012 12:14 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 12:35 am 
Donald SmithAug 17, 2012 7:02 am 
Martijn VerburgAug 17, 2012 7:08 am 
Peter Van de VoordeAug 17, 2012 7:11 am 
John YearyAug 17, 2012 7:30 am 
Hildeberto MendonçaAug 17, 2012 7:41 am 
Joe Sam ShirahAug 17, 2012 7:59 am 
Milton SmithAug 17, 2012 9:08 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:29 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:42 am 
Tobias FrechAug 17, 2012 9:50 am 
Frans ThamuraAug 17, 2012 9:55 am 
John YearyAug 17, 2012 10:00 am 
Milton SmithAug 17, 2012 10:12 am 
Subject:[jug-leaders] Re: That's bad for JavaFx
From:Donald Smith (dona@oracle.com)
Date:Aug 16, 2012 10:46:25 am
List:net.java.dev.jugs.jug-leaders

Understood -- there's parallel streams though, so if you were running a year+ old version of 6 on the desktop, it'd also encourage you to update. 7u1 is old within it's major release stram, hence the warnings

On 16/08/2012 12:46 PM, Frank Greco wrote:

Most enterprises are still on early Java 6 on the desktop. Updates to client-side software are not that timely unfortunately.

I took an informal poll at the last NYJavaSIG meeting (about 150 attendees) on what JVM versions were used. I think I got 1 person saying they were using Java 7 in production.

Frank G