9 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRE: [courier-users] Re: The end of Re...
FromSent OnAttachments
DanNov 5, 2003 1:04 am 
Sam VarshavchikNov 5, 2003 4:12 am 
Bill HackerNov 7, 2003 10:43 am 
Malcolm WeirNov 7, 2003 11:01 am 
Bill HackerNov 7, 2003 12:50 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Nov 7, 2003 12:56 pm 
Jon NelsonNov 7, 2003 3:02 pm 
Joe EmenakerNov 7, 2003 3:17 pm 
Bill HackerNov 7, 2003 7:50 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:RE: [courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...Actions...
From:Jon Nelson (jnel@jamponi.net)
Date:Nov 7, 2003 3:02:52 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:

Bill, I'm a staunch FreeBSD supporter (*BSD in general as my second choice) BUT, I see some things in Linux that although they aren't mature enough for my taste, I'd welcome similar initiatives in FreeBSD - one however is a bit of a sticking point for Courier, and that is FAM's kernel support.

Implementing this in FreeBSD would require a modification to FAM (better as FreeBSD's kqueue events are more robust than Linux's inode monitoring) but this is not the route the FAM guys are trying to push things - they want everyone to emulate the Linux event scheme.

Honestly, I don't know why they don't use something like glib's (not glibc, g-lib) event looping. It's portable, it's reasonably clean. There are others, too!