Why do I detect a tongue-in-cheek here? Is Robin Baird talking about HOMO SAPIENS? Who is going to be the lucky bugger (or unlucky, depending upon how one looks at it) who will be declared the type of HOMO SAPIENS? We must have a robust individual, typical in all respects, etc. Why do we assume it must be a male? Are the diagnostic features better on males? Certainly the mammae on a female would be better developed than those on a male. And the presence of mammary glands is a diagnostic feature, no? Nuff said.