31 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Kay, Allen M30 May 2007 12:05 
Keir Fraser30 May 2007 12:55 
Kay, Allen M30 May 2007 15:02 
Guy Zana30 May 2007 23:04 
Keir Fraser30 May 2007 23:49 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 06:20 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 06:36 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 06:58 
Guy Zana31 May 2007 07:08 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 08:02 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 08:09 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 08:14 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 08:29 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 08:39 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 08:51 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 08:52 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 08:58 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 09:03 
Guy Zana31 May 2007 09:07 
Keir Fraser31 May 2007 09:28 
Kay, Allen M31 May 2007 10:43 
Guy Zana31 May 2007 10:59 
Kay, Allen M31 May 2007 11:42 
Tian, Kevin31 May 2007 19:56 
Kay, Allen M03 Jun 2007 01:28 
Keir Fraser03 Jun 2007 01:36 
Guy Zana03 Jun 2007 02:58 
Tian, Kevin03 Jun 2007 06:29 
Keir Fraser03 Jun 2007 06:34 
Guy Zana03 Jun 2007 07:34 
Kay, Allen M04 Jun 2007 15:55 
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d
From:Keir Fraser (ke@xensource.com)
Date:05/31/2007 09:28:34 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

On 31/5/07 16:59, "Tian, Kevin" <kevi@intel.com> wrote:

Agree to support both with a common infrastructure.

We don't need both! Let's look at which is cleanest and/or fastest and make a judgment call.

-- Keir

_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel