24 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1518030...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| SourceForge.net | Feb 10, 2007 10:45 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 3:42 am | |
| SourceForge.net | Feb 11, 2007 4:22 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Feb 11, 2007 5:55 am | |
| SourceForge.net | Feb 11, 2007 6:24 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 6:42 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 6:56 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 7:04 am |  .pd |
| Tim Blechmann | Feb 11, 2007 12:49 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 1:34 pm | |
| Thomas Grill | Feb 11, 2007 1:39 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 1:53 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Feb 11, 2007 2:02 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 2:27 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Feb 11, 2007 3:09 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 11, 2007 3:37 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Feb 11, 2007 4:22 pm | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 12, 2007 12:19 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 12, 2007 12:53 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 12, 2007 2:55 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 12, 2007 3:38 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 13, 2007 1:39 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 13, 2007 2:39 am | .pd |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 13, 2007 4:58 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1518030 ] subpatch clearing itself crashes Pd | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | IOhannes m zmoelnig (zmoe...@iem.at) | |
| Date: | Feb 12, 2007 2:55:09 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
Frank Barknecht wrote:
however, i don't think it is a valid assumption for pd itself. in this case, i would highly prefer an error-message to the console (an "exception") and no destruction at all. (since usually you have more complex settings when doing dynamic patching, e.g. [clear, obj 0 0 inlet, obj 0 100 outlet, connect 0 0 1 0( )
"clear" alone may be fine in this case, but I suppose things get hairy
obviously this is just the simplest example i was able to think of. what i was trying to illustrate is: i expect [clear, obj 0 0 foo( to clear the entire canvas and then to create an instance of [foo]. using your "delay" message for the "clear", would first create the [foo] object and then delete the entire canvas (including [foo]). of course i could delay the creation of [foo] too, but this would make things over-complicated (imho) and klugdy. i could also do the patching by hand or not use pd alltogether.
if you just delete a some objects using e.g. "find foo, cut", and then create some new ones and try to connect them. Wouldn't the numbering of objects necessary for [connect ...( be invalid now, too? At least the bookkeeping would get even more difficult than it already is.
this is just another example that illustrates (imo), that the automatic delay would not necessarily make things better.
mfg.asdr. IOhannes