13 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-develRE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen]...
FromSent OnAttachments
Zhang, Xiantao27 Jul 2006 01:04 
Akio Takebe27 Jul 2006 01:46 
Zhang, Xiantao27 Jul 2006 02:14 
Akio Takebe27 Jul 2006 02:35.patch
Zhang, Xiantao27 Jul 2006 02:37 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 09:40 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 10:05 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 10:07 
Akio Takebe27 Jul 2006 18:00 
Zhang, Xiantao27 Jul 2006 18:13 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 21:41 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 21:42 
Aron Griffis27 Jul 2006 21:45 
Subject:RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
From:Zhang, Xiantao (xian@intel.com)
Date:07/27/2006 02:37:21 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-devel

Very clear now! Thank you very much. -Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

-----Original Message----- From: Akio Takebe [mailto:take@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: 2006年7月27日 17:36 To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedo@redhat.com; Chris Wright; fedo@redhat.com; xen-@lists.xensource.com; Akio Takebe Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

Hi, Xiantao

Yes, you are right. And I think you must use the following patch.

Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable (not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6. I'm debuging it. Then I'll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen- fedora.

diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200 +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900 @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b

static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip) { - return chip->vendor->buffersize; + return chip->vendor.buffersize; }

extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe

Hi Akio, Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should be latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron's patches on it. right? In addition, what's status about it? BTW,

Thanks & Best Regards -Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

-----Original Message----- From: Akio Takebe [mailto:take@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47 To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedo@redhat.com; Chris Wright; fedo@redhat.com; xen-@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

Hi, Xiantao

BZ's patch is old. Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree. So I think we should use Aron's patches.

Best Regards,

Hi Aron, Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through your

mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But when I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any suggestion for contributing to Fedora ? Thanks & Best Regards -Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

-----Original Message----- From: fedo@redhat.com [mailto:fedo@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Aron Griffis Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11 To: Juan Quintela Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedo@redhat.com; Chris Wright; fedo@redhat.com; Alex Williamson; xen-@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

Hi Juan,

These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working on fixing the ia64 build of your tree. At this point the bare-metal Linux kernel builds and boots. The xen kernel builds but doesn't complete booting. Nonetheless, since these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we'd like to request them to be applied to your tree.

Thanks, Aron