5 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] undefined non weak sy...
FromSent OnAttachments
Axel ThimmDec 30, 2007 1:53 am 
Tony EarnshawDec 30, 2007 5:48 am 
Sam VarshavchikDec 30, 2007 6:27 am 
Axel ThimmJan 13, 2008 1:31 am 
Axel ThimmJan 13, 2008 1:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] undefined non weak symbols when installing with shared libsActions...
From:Axel Thimm (Axel@ATrpms.net)
Date:Jan 13, 2008 1:35:24 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:49:01PM +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:

Axel Thimm skrev, on 30-12-2007 10:54:

when maildrop is installed with enable shared the libs are missing symbols:

You don't say what maildrop, you don't say what OS or distribution this is, you detail:

- obviously the latest - the os could be read further below like Fedora (but the same is true for RHEL or non-Linux OSes)

W: maildrop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/librfc822.so.0.0.0
unicode_ISO8859_1

This is not a GCC error;

No one claimed it was - it is a runtime linker error ...

[...]

It looks like some libs are not being installed, e.g. libunicode. Building it statically works, but for certain distributions like Fedora (where I'm trying to import this package)

What does "where I'm trying to import this package" imply?

A peer review and an approval. But why are these details of importance?

Anyway, Sam's response was indeed helpful and I know now what I need to do, thanks anyway!

-- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net