atom feed1 message in org.oasis-open.lists.wss-commentWS-Security 1.0 Support
FromSent OnAttachments
Tony OpathaSep 26, 2003 12:13 pm 
Subject:WS-Security 1.0 Support
From:Tony Opatha (topa@yahoo.com)
Date:Sep 26, 2003 12:13:27 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wss-comment

Kindly please answer following question.

Thanks in advance.

1) WS-Security v.1.0 Support Which vendors are currently supporting the WS-Security v.1.0 specification such that they support the final version of the WS-Security namespace (assuming this is the frozen namespace v.1.0): xmlns:wsse=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/secext xmlns:wsu=htp://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/utility

2) In particular is IBM WSDK 5.1, Microsoft .NET1.1/ WSE supporting or will support within Q4 '03 the latest namespace of WS-Security?

3) Namespace Mismatch Issue The reason for above question is obviously concern for SOAP Message Security interoperability is somewhat depdendent on the namespace assumption used (i.e., WS-Security XSD schema specs) used in a SOAP client and a SOAP service. If the SOAP client uses e.g., uses an older implementation of WS-Security (e.g., Verisign TSIK v. 1.7) that has following namespace:

xmlns:wsse=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2002/07/secext

xmlns:wsu=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2002/07/utility

then obviously such a client and service interaction will fail due to security non-interoperability.

4) Rationale for WS-Security Versioning Scheme Lastly why did the OASIS WSS TC decide to embed explicitly the WS-Security (in particular the SOAP Message Security Specification) release date into the XML namespace for its XSD schema specification? Such version management practice is bound to cause interoperability challenges that could have easily been avoidable with expressing the versioning information as an XML attribute (e.g., <xsd:attribute name="version" type="xsd:string">) which is consistent with the way the OASIS SSTC/SAML TC dealt with security schema specification evolution issue.

Even if OASIS WSS TC does make the change w.r.t. #4, I'm curious how to deal with #3 unless vendors will support #1 ASAP.

Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search