| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| cr | Oct 22, 2004 1:51 am | |
| guenter geiger | Oct 22, 2004 3:46 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 22, 2004 6:50 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 22, 2004 1:26 pm | |
| carmen | Oct 22, 2004 1:41 pm | |
| Matju | Oct 22, 2004 2:33 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Oct 22, 2004 6:37 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Oct 23, 2004 2:37 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 23, 2004 3:13 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 23, 2004 3:28 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Oct 24, 2004 8:21 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Oct 24, 2004 9:53 am | |
| Matju | Oct 25, 2004 8:33 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 25, 2004 11:53 am | |
| Matju | Oct 25, 2004 1:47 pm | |
| guenter geiger | Oct 26, 2004 1:45 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 27, 2004 3:01 am | |
| guenter geiger | Oct 27, 2004 3:17 am | |
| Matju | Oct 29, 2004 10:50 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 29, 2004 1:39 pm | |
| Matju | Nov 14, 2004 10:43 pm | |
| guenter geiger | Nov 15, 2004 6:48 am | |
| Matju | Nov 15, 2004 1:24 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Nov 15, 2004 1:51 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Nov 15, 2004 1:57 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 15, 2004 4:43 pm | |
| guenter geiger | Nov 16, 2004 2:54 am | |
| guenter geiger | Nov 16, 2004 3:11 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 16, 2004 5:51 am | |
| Miller Puckette | Nov 16, 2004 10:32 am | |
| Miller Puckette | Nov 16, 2004 12:12 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 16, 2004 1:18 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 17, 2004 5:06 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Nov 17, 2004 11:06 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 17, 2004 3:17 pm | |
| guenter geiger | Nov 18, 2004 4:57 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 26, 2004 5:45 am | |
| Miller Puckette | Nov 28, 2004 11:37 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 28, 2004 4:21 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Jun 30, 2005 3:28 am | |
| Miller Puckette | Jul 1, 2005 11:15 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Jul 6, 2005 12:02 am |
| Subject: | Re: garrays in dsp (was Re: [PD-dev] re: branch convergence) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Tim Blechmann (TimB...@gmx.net) | |
| Date: | Nov 28, 2004 4:21:26 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
Well, it might be simpler to store a pointer to the t_array instead of one to the actual vector (a_vec) in the DSP routines. That way,
yes, but it would break the compatibility with garray_getfloatarray
resizing or swapping vectors could happen without re-sorting DSP, but you'd still have to re-sort ig a "t_garray" got deleted or renamed.
hm ... i haven't checked, what happens if a t_garray will be renamed ... deleting will possibly have the same behaviour as deleting a dsp object ...
I've almost finished my work of redesigning the garray/array business (to unify it with arrays in "structs") and hope to check it in today...
i'm curious to see it ...
cheers ... tim
-- mailto:TimB...@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager." William S. Burroughs





