29 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Proposed extensio...
FromSent OnAttachments
Matthias WimmerSep 25, 2007 5:17 pm 
Tim LythSep 25, 2007 6:04 pm 
Alessandro VeselySep 26, 2007 12:18 am 
Matthias WimmerSep 26, 2007 3:07 am 
Gordon MessmerSep 26, 2007 1:12 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 26, 2007 3:54 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 26, 2007 11:06 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 4:37 am 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 6:12 am 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 8:04 am 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 2:59 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 3:19 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 3:25 pm 
Matthias WimmerSep 27, 2007 3:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 4:10 pm 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 4:32 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 27, 2007 4:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerSep 27, 2007 4:58 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 10:05 pm 
Bernd WurstSep 27, 2007 10:07 pm 
Alessandro VeselySep 28, 2007 1:25 am 
Julian MehnleNov 12, 2007 2:52 am 
Sam VarshavchikNov 12, 2007 3:59 am 
Julian MehnleMar 5, 2008 7:03 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 5, 2008 7:59 am 
Bernd WurstMar 5, 2008 8:54 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 5, 2008 9:32 am 
Julian MehnleMar 5, 2008 9:54 am 
Sam VarshavchikMar 5, 2008 4:24 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Proposed extension: SKIPMAILFILTER [patch]Actions...
From:Bernd Wurst (ber@bwurst.org)
Date:Sep 27, 2007 10:05:23 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Hi.

Am Freitag, 28. September 2007 schrieb Matthias Wimmer:

Sam Varshavchik schrieb:

Sam, please clarify this: Is there an intended "u" line in the control file? Is it present in only newer or older releases? Why is this undocumented and only working for me?

It's comparatively new, and is not present in the older releases. Yes, it needs to be documented.

Since which version is this present? I am working with version 0.56.0 and do not see this line.

Ok, ok, I'm sorry. After having a deeper look in my self-written filter, I saw that I have implemented the scan for an "u" line but I also set the same internal variable afterwards by parsing the first Received-Header.

Seems like I missed that when I looked into the code to write my posting. :(

cu, Bernd