atom feed17 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Connection to por...
FromSent OnAttachments
Bowie BaileyJul 9, 2002 12:00 pm 
Thorsten SchroederJul 9, 2002 12:15 pm 
Richard GeoffrionJul 9, 2002 12:46 pm 
Bowie BaileyJul 9, 2002 12:55 pm 
Peter C. NortonJul 9, 2002 1:14 pm 
Peter C. NortonJul 9, 2002 1:16 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 9, 2002 2:11 pm 
Bowie BaileyJul 9, 2002 2:50 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 9, 2002 3:14 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 9, 2002 5:13 pm 
Bowie BaileyJul 10, 2002 6:51 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 10, 2002 7:27 am 
Matt BartonJul 10, 2002 8:34 am 
Peter C. NortonJul 10, 2002 10:07 am 
Juha SaarinenJul 10, 2002 1:16 pm 
Bowie BaileyJul 10, 2002 2:07 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 10, 2002 3:12 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Connection to port 113
From:Matt Barton (ma@webexc.com)
Date:Jul 10, 2002 8:34:41 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Peter C. Norton wrote:

That makes sense. Any idea how to do a "reject" with a Cisco access list? As far as I know it's just accept or deny.

If its only accept or drop, you can always let it through and let your mail host reject it.

That would work, but you would be opening up a hole through your firewall. A malicious user that gained access to the server could setup a service on that port and you wouldn't be the wiser.

- --

Matt Barton Webexcellence PH: 317.423.3548 x22 TF: 800.808.6332 x22 FX: 317.423.8735 ma@webexc.com www.webexc.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9LFSV67cWHlKNnWkRAt65AKDQEyR151RawTpQAi7pQmWO00YGhgCeMD9D vxyHVQHFgvYtkUc8LJO3BvY= =cDFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----