28 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRE: which one is better?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 20, 2009 11:19 pm | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 12:40 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 1:10 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 1:31 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 1:44 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 1:53 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 2:02 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 3:31 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 3:49 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 3:51 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 3:56 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 3:59 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 4:38 am | |
| Glen Lumanau | Apr 21, 2009 4:41 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 4:48 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 4:50 am | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 21, 2009 11:49 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 1:31 pm | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 21, 2009 3:37 pm | |
| Joe Bofh | Apr 21, 2009 3:51 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Apr 21, 2009 3:59 pm | |
| AMP Admin | Apr 21, 2009 4:13 pm | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 21, 2009 5:48 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Apr 21, 2009 10:50 pm | |
| Igor Sysoev | Apr 21, 2009 11:41 pm | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 22, 2009 7:38 am | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 22, 2009 12:16 pm | |
| Jonathan Vanasco | Apr 23, 2009 10:53 am |
| Subject: | RE: which one is better? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Glen Lumanau (gl...@lumanau.web.id) | |
| Date: | Apr 21, 2009 1:44:05 am | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
I already tried this
Here's the config
fastcgi_cache_path /data/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=one:10m inactive=7d max_size=200m; fastcgi_temp_path /data/nginx/temp;
location @joomla { fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000; fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME /home/kompastv/web/index.php; fastcgi_cache one; fastcgi_cache_key 127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri; fastcgi_cache_valid 200 1h;
/data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
root 28119 0.0 0.0 13940 496 ? Ss 15:41 0:00 nginx: master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf nginx 28120 1.3 0.2 17328 4408 ? R 15:41 0:01 nginx: worker process nginx 28122 1.6 0.2 17384 4540 ? S 15:41 0:01 nginx: worker process nginx 28123 0.0 0.0 14096 800 ? S 15:41 0:00 nginx: cache manager process
is there somethink i've missed?
-----Original Message----- From: owne...@sysoev.ru [mailto:owne...@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor Sysoev Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32 To: ngi...@sysoev.ru Subject: Re: which one is better?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same format as proxy_cache?
Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
fastcgi_cache_key localhost:9000$request_uri;
while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
proxy_cache_key $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
-----Original Message----- From: owne...@sysoev.ru [mailto:owne...@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor Sysoev Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41 To: ngi...@sysoev.ru Subject: Re: which one is better?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
I still wonder which one is better for performance
Pure nginx + php-fpm
Or
Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
Anybody knows about this?
Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache too.
-- Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/
-- Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/