atom feed21 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRe: [kde-freebsd] Building kdebase3
FromSent OnAttachments
Jonathan ChenAug 2, 2002 2:42 am 
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 3:13 am.h
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 3:49 am 
Alan EAug 2, 2002 3:55 am 
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 4:08 am 
Andy FawcettAug 2, 2002 4:09 am 
Frerich RaabeAug 2, 2002 4:13 am.diff
Alan EAug 2, 2002 4:14 am 
Alan EAug 2, 2002 4:19 am 
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 4:38 am 
Karel J. BosschaartAug 2, 2002 6:20 am 
Frerich RaabeAug 2, 2002 6:21 am 
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 6:41 am 
Michael NottebrockAug 2, 2002 6:59 am 
Matthew EmmertonAug 2, 2002 8:31 am 
Alan EAug 2, 2002 9:50 am 
Jonathan ChenAug 2, 2002 1:26 pm 
Kent StewartAug 2, 2002 1:46 pm 
Kent StewartAug 2, 2002 6:59 pm 
Jonathan ChenAug 3, 2002 6:21 pm 
Alan EAug 4, 2002 12:45 am 
Subject:Re: [kde-freebsd] Building kdebase3
From:Michael Nottebrock (mich@gmx.net)
Date:Aug 2, 2002 6:41:22 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

The following is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message created by Enigmail/Mozilla, following RFC 2440 and RFC 2015

Alan E wrote:

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Frerich Raabe wrote: Content-Description: clearsigned data

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On Friday 02 August 2002 12:55, Alan E wrote:

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:14:18PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Apparently, it's possible to build things in such an order that klistview.h doesn't exist at the time uic is run and so the include does not get generated; at least that's my hypothesis as of now. i don't think uic is borked, but i think the environment around it is

That .ui files fails to include a file. Try the attached patch please.

Nope. Try again. It's not a kdebase issue.

I think this might happen because people update the kdebase-port (because its revision was bumped) and qt (because it was updated), but not kdelibs, which will result in a mixed-pickles kde with qt-3.0.3-kdelibs & everything else and qt-3.0.5-kdebase. So maybe a revision-bump of all kde-ports that install binaries (or some sort of qt-plugins) is in order.

At the moment this is just speculation though, I noticed that the mismatching versions don't work very well with each other because the styles that kdelibs installs won't show up in a qt-3.0.5-kdebase3.0.2_2.

I'm going to delete my kdebase-patch and portupgrade -rf qt30 now, and see what happens.

Regards.