atom feed17 messages in org.apache.tomcat.usersRE: Best Practices Question
FromSent OnAttachments
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 1:44 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:20 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:23 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:26 am 
Barry MooreSep 29, 2002 3:39 pm 
V. CekvenichSep 29, 2002 5:31 pm 
Kent PerrierSep 29, 2002 6:07 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 29, 2002 6:39 pm 
Oskar BartensteinSep 29, 2002 8:30 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 29, 2002 10:17 pm 
Oskar BartensteinSep 30, 2002 1:10 am 
Turner, JohnSep 30, 2002 5:35 am 
Turner, JohnSep 30, 2002 5:38 am 
Step...@bmwfin.comSep 30, 2002 5:38 am 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 30, 2002 9:22 am 
Glenn NielsenSep 30, 2002 1:13 pm 
Glenn NielsenSep 30, 2002 1:45 pm 
Subject:RE: Best Practices Question
From:Turner, John (JTur@AAS.com)
Date:Sep 30, 2002 5:38:25 am
List:org.apache.tomcat.users

-----Original Message----- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:crai@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 9:40 PM

... snip...

Valid reasons to need it include:

* Tomcat standalone is not fast enough (note that this is different from a rule saying select the "fastest possible" solution -- that turns out not to be a requirement in every scenario).

* You need the extra features that Apache provides (such as integration with existing modules).

* You need to run on port 80 in an environment that requires root for this.

* You already know how to configure it, so there's no extra learning curve.

I would include load-balancing as well (multiple Tomcats, one or more Apaches).

Blindly installing Apache+Tomcat because "that's the thing to do" is a waste of effort in many scenarios.

Agreed.

Craig

John