atom feed20 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: Ethernet MTUs > 1500?
FromSent OnAttachments
David GilbertJul 3, 2000 8:22 pm 
Joerg MicheelJul 3, 2000 8:38 pm 
David GilbertJul 3, 2000 8:43 pm 
Louis A. MamakosJul 3, 2000 8:52 pm 
David GilbertJul 3, 2000 9:37 pm 
Louis A. MamakosJul 3, 2000 10:08 pm 
Tim PriebeJul 4, 2000 3:50 am 
Kevin ObermanJul 4, 2000 4:24 pm 
David GilbertJul 4, 2000 6:46 pm 
Tim PriebeJul 5, 2000 5:46 am 
David GilbertJul 5, 2000 6:20 am 
Luigi RizzoJul 5, 2000 8:16 am 
Tim PriebeJul 5, 2000 9:56 am 
Luigi RizzoJul 5, 2000 11:39 pm 
Tim PriebeJul 6, 2000 5:34 am 
David GilbertJul 6, 2000 5:47 am 
Tim PriebeJul 6, 2000 8:04 am 
Luigi RizzoJul 6, 2000 8:28 am 
Luigi RizzoJul 6, 2000 8:37 am 
Tim PriebeJul 6, 2000 9:38 am 
Subject:Re: Ethernet MTUs > 1500?
From:Luigi Rizzo (lui@info.iet.unipi.it)
Date:Jul 5, 2000 11:39:53 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

just curious, what do we do when we have multiple encapsulation ? (i.e. is this allowed ?)

...

I am not sure what you mean. If you mean "VLAN encapsulation", then it is a misunderstanding. The standard Ethernet frame is not encapsulated.

ok think of the following: I have a st machine which goes through a VLAN bridge out to a trunk interface, which in turn goes into a VLAN bridge which does trunkinking again ... basically you might end up with frames being encapsulated multiple times (and decapsulated on the reverse path). Now i wonder if this is allowed by the vlan spec and also how does a vlan bridge behaves when it sees a vlan-tagged frame on a non-trunk port. I do know how my FreeBSD-based vlan bridge behaves -- it does multiple encaps, but then if a packet becomes too large it is silently dropped by the interface.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message