10 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRequest gcc 34 port build gcj| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Dung | Aug 27, 2005 1:53 pm | |
| Gerald Pfeifer | Sep 1, 2005 11:12 pm | |
| Jim Trigg | Sep 2, 2005 12:02 am | |
| Patrick Dung | Sep 2, 2005 4:52 pm | |
| Gerald Pfeifer | Sep 17, 2005 3:04 pm | |
| Patrick Dung | Sep 17, 2005 11:11 pm | |
| Gerald Pfeifer | Sep 19, 2005 5:26 am | |
| Patrick Dung | Sep 19, 2005 9:57 am | |
| Adam McDougall | Oct 24, 2005 2:06 pm | |
| Gerald Pfeifer | Oct 25, 2005 2:40 am |
| Subject: | Request gcc 34 port build gcj | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Patrick Dung (patr...@yahoo.com.hk) | |
| Date: | Sep 17, 2005 11:11:51 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
Before you make gcj only build in gcc41 port, we can compile pdftk with gcj in gcc34 port. After that, only gcc41 has gcj. We have compile problem with pdftk.
So I try to fix pdftk in the ports but failed. And I have told the pdftk author. He said he is busy. He has looked into the problem and try to make a pre release later, but that was already half month ago.
I think the problem should also appear in Linux with pdftk and gcj 4.1 because the problem is related to itext that comes with pdftk and gcj41.
Regards Patrick
--- Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Patrick Dung wrote:
Would you please brifely explain the changes/difference for building gcj for gcc 3.x and gcc 4.x port?
There shouldn't be much of a difference in how GCC is configured and built. The package lists will differ and so forth, and one may need to check the static versus shared library cases and so forth, but nothing absolutely different.
What is the problem pdftk exhibits with current versions of GCC? What do the upstream authors say? Can this be reproduced on GNU/Linux as well?
Gerald
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com