atom feed8 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: (fwd) Re: mai...
FromSent OnAttachments
Matthias AndreeJan 19, 2003 5:13 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 19, 2003 5:50 pm 
Wietse VenemaJan 19, 2003 5:56 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 19, 2003 7:09 pm 
Brenda BellJan 19, 2003 8:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 19, 2003 9:41 pm 
Matthias AndreeJan 20, 2003 4:01 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 20, 2003 4:14 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: (fwd) Re: maildir in Gnus vs. clock corrections and PID recycling
From:Matthias Andree (ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)
Date:Jan 20, 2003 4:14:42 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Sam Varshavchik <mrs@courier-mta.com> writes:

That's not quite the point. The original issue is whether you want to start using time.inode.hostname in this day and age. The original answer was no, because you will collide with time.pid.hostname. WV dismisses this, claiming that nobody's using time.pid.hostname. Well, that's clearly not true. Plenty of stuff uses time.pid.hostname.

This isn't the first time WV changed Postfix in a way that broke stuff that worked before.

The patch he issues was clearly and unmistakably marked as "tentative" and inofficial, the final code is not yet released. It's a bit too early to claim "Wietse broke things that used to work." -- the Postfix releases are still at time.pid.hostname, which, as we know now, is lacking.

-- Matthias Andree